Posts Tagged ‘Thesis’
Wednesday, September 24th, 2008
Not likely, according to PIMCO’s Bill Gross. In his most recent Investment Outlook, Gross, reasons and opposes (for now) the idea that in the very different worlds of Louis Rukeyser, Jim Cramer, and Jim Grant, “There’s always a bull market somewhere!”
While he does agree that there are always stocks, bonds, and currencies that can be found to be going up, while markets are going down, Gross cautions:
So the lesson must be to go forth and find the bull market, wherever it is. Almost always – but NOT NOW, because in a global financial marketplace in the process of delevering, assets that go up in price are rare diamonds as opposed to grains of sand. For the past several months our PIMCO Investment Committee blackboard has continued to display the following lesson plan:
What Happens During Delevering
- Risk spreads, liquidity spreads, volatility, term premiums – they all go up.
- Delevering slows/stops when assets have been liquidated and/or sufficient capital has been raised to produce an equilibrium.
- The raising of sufficient capital now depends on the entrance of new balance sheets. Absent that, prices of almost all assets will go down.
Essentially, Gross’ thesis is that as the GSEs, banks, investment banks and global hedge funds delever their balance sheets, they also lower the prices of all securities that can be arbitraged within the marketplace.
The 10% year over year decline in prices has not been witnessed since the great depression, and that is a red flag.
a 10% aggregate asset price decline does more than make us all 10% less wealthy. Because many of these assets are leveraged and margined, the more they decline, the more frequent and frenzied the margin calls, and if the additional cash flow is not provided, not only an asset liquidation but a debt liquidation follows. It is the debt liquidation that potentially turns a stagnant/recessionary economy into something much worse.
This rare event of systematic debt liquidation is the central issue in both the US and globally. If central bankers are unable to take effective measures, the campfire could turn into a forest fire, and a mild asset bear market could turn into a destructive financial tsunami. Gross points out that even they and their SWF and central bank counterparts who have been doing their part to stem the tide, and in some cases bought into debt issues too early, only to see those issues now priced “underwater,” are now reluctant to make additional commitments.
Paulson and Bernanke have consulted PIMCO regularly throughout the credit market debacle, and have apparently acted on some of that advice as well as that of others like Pershing Square’s Bill Ackman, who floated a Frannie bailout plan prior to the Fed’s that was eerily similar.
Paul McCulley stated in late July, that the only thing that was viable given the delevering of the market that was well underway, was for government to lever up its balance sheet, much the way it is proposing to this week, with the $700-billion TARP plan.
Gross too, re-iterates and lobbies for this in his newsletter most recently published newsletter:
common sense can lead to no other conclusion: if we are to prevent a continuing asset and debt liquidation of near historic proportions, we will require policies that open up the balance sheet of the U.S. Treasury – not only to Freddie and Fannie but to Mom and Pop on Main Street U.S.A., via subsidized home loans issued by the FHA and other government institutions.
Gross concludes:
Now that the Fed has spent 12 months proving that it “knows something…knows something,” it is time for the Treasury to do likewise.
(note: these ideas were published well before the Fed/Treasury realized the need for a far reaching solution)
Is there a bull market somewhere?
There is, but those assets are “rare as diamonds, as opposed to grains of sand,” according to Bill Gross.
Investment Outlook, Bill Gross, September 2008
Source: PIMCO
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: Amp, Bailout, Banks, Bear Market, Bernanke, Bill Ackman, Bill Gross, Blog, Chart, Credit, Credit Market, Economy, Fed, Grain, GSE, Hedge Fund, Hedge Funds, Investment Banks, liquidity, Markets, Paul McCulley, Paulson, Pershing Square, PIMCO, Recession, risk, spreads, Thesis, UK, Water
Posted in Markets | No Comments »
Monday, August 25th, 2008
Jason Zweig’s latest column at the WSJ (Psyching Yourself Up to Let Losers Go ) tackles a tough issue for most investors - when to sell. Selling can be difficult for a variety of reasons, but a big factor is psychology. We don’t like to let go and give up things we’ve bought. Zweig provides us with a telling statistic:
Individual and professional investors alike struggle with selling. Berkeley finance professor Terrance Odean has found that investors are at least 50% more likely to sell their winners than their losers. Among the money managers surveyed by Cabot Research, a Boston consulting firm, fewer than 30% base their sell decisions on “extensive research.” The rest concede they basically sell by the seat of their pants.
To defend our portfolios from our emotions, Zweig offers us six techniques.
1. Use stop-loss orders
I’ve never been a fan of using a stop-loss order on a company’s stock. I know that Investors Business Daily advocates the use of selling whenever a company falls 10% and I think it’s too trivial of a rule. Zweig says that he doesn’t advocate the use of stop losses but prefers “stop look” orders:
Whenever a stock drops, say, 25% below what you paid, automatically review your original top three reasons for buying to see whether they are still valid. That will prevent you from selling without thinking first.
This is a pretty good idea. I practice the same kind of exercise myself. I don’t have any alerts set to tell me when about a drop of 25%, but I do check my company’s prices regularly. An easy way to get notified of drops in your companies can be done with Yahoo Alerts, you can get an e-mail or text message based up requirements you set (price drop/rise or percent drop/rise). Two of my holdings, Air Transport Services Group (NASDAQ: ATSG) and Steak N Shake (NYSE: SNS) have fallen a bit from my initial buying points ($1.70 and $10.00).
In each of these cases, I re-analyzed my investment thesis, to see if anything changed. With ATSG, the fall from $1.70 to below $1.00 was triggered by almost no news. DHL severing business ties with ATSG was already part of my investment idea- so I didn’t see a reason to sell. With SNS, my thesis hinged on Sardar Biglari getting onto the board and gaining control so that he could make the right decisions for the company. I decided that I would not sell till that thesis was properly tested.
2. Don’t Go Far Afield
Here, Zweig recommends buying an industry index if the company you purchased ends up having poor results. I don’t quite agree with this advice. It all seems a little bit like decisions made by an investor who doesn’t know what they’re doing who is trying to catch a trend (and may be too late).
The only time I think that this is valid is when you’re investing in an industry with good economics but where the individual players might be too hard to pick. I’m thinking of Buffett’s investments in pharma with companies like Sanofi Aventis (NYSE: SNY), GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK), and Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ). The difference with Buffett’s investments in pharmaceutical companies is that he still was not buying an ETF, he bought just a few of the players in that industry. An ETF will usually have many more holdings and carry the risk of over diversification.
3. Shop Before You Drop
Zweig’s next technique is a bit better-
Ask yourself: Which stock or fund would I most like to own? Then view your losers as a source of funding to reduce the amount of cash you would otherwise need to raise
Sometimes I think that selling losers can be good, especially if you’re purchasing a better buy. Maybe a new opportunity has presented itself with a higher return or the margin of safety in your losing investment has narrowed.
4. Re-price it.
Here, the idea is to take your original purchase price and divide it by 10 and compare that price with its current price. A simpler method might be to look at the price you’re seeing right now and compare it to your conservative estimate for the company’s margin of safety(the spread between the current price and the company’s intrinsic value you in your eyes). If you’re buying companies at what you think are 50% discounts, you’ll see a wider margin of safety. It will then be up to you to decide if anything has changed.
If the margin of safety has narrowed to a point where maybe the capital could be better used elsewhere, then you should.
5. Follow your sales.
This is some of the best advice in the column.
Using an online portfolio tracker, monitor the returns of all the stocks you sell after you sell them. Studying the aftermath of your mistakes will enable you to learn which you sold too soon and which too late. You cannot improve what you do not measure.
I try to do the same. On my Google Finance page I keep all of my stocks, even after selling them. I like to see what they’re currently doing and learn from my mistakes and the company’s mistakes. By doing this, you expand your circle of competence. It makes me think of a quote from Edward Lampert in Fortune Magazine.
[The] idea of anticipation is key to investing and to business generally. You can’t wait for an opportunity to become obvious. You have to think, “Here’s what other people and companies have done under certain circumstances. Now, under these new circumstances, how is this management likely to behave?” The plays my father designed for me helped me learn to think ahead. Lots of days I asked him, “Why can’t we just invite kids over and play a game?” In order to do something well, he explained, you have to keep practicing and preparing.
And I think that’s one of the more important concepts to keep in mind when investing. You can often draw upon past experiences when making future decisions. The situation might not be entirely the same, but it’s incredibly useful to have that kind of knowledge filed away for future reference.
Courtesy: StreetCapitalist.com
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: Amp, Economi, Economics, EFU, ETF, Investment Strategy, Money Managers, Rally, risk, SMI, Thesis, Value
Posted in Investment Strategy, Markets | No Comments »
Friday, August 1st, 2008
This week, John Mauldin features the thesis by Pimco’s Paul McCulley, on the subject of the deleveraging of the financial system. Here are a few excerpts:
The Paradox of Thrift:
For me, a simple concept brought this realization: the paradox of thrift. For those of you who might not recall, the paradox of thrift posits that if we all individually cut our spending in an attempt to increase individual savings, then our collective savings will paradoxically fall because one person’s spending is another’s income – the fountain from which savings flow.
On Monetary Easing:
But monetary easing is of limited value in breaking the paradox of deleveraging if levered lenders are collectively destroying their collective net worth. What is needed instead is for somebody to lever up and take on the assets being shed by those deleveraging. It really is that simple.
Read the complete article here - The Paradox of Deleveraging, Paul McCulley
Source: John Mauldin
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: Excerpts, John Mauldin, Paul McCulley, Php, PIMCO, risk, Thesis, Value
Posted in Markets | No Comments »
Wednesday, April 30th, 2008
April 28, 2008 - Barron’s magazine has gotten their hands on Alan Greenspan’s Ph. D. thesis and provides analysis. The bottom line is that Greenspan long underestimated the potential effects of a popped housing bubble. Here are some excerpts:
There are only two known copies: the Maestro’s own and the one we viewed. As far as we can tell, Barron’s is the only news organization ever to have seen the thesis since a third and now missing copy was removed from the public shelves of NYU’s Bobst library at Greenspan’s request in 1987, the year that Ronald Reagan appointed him chairman of the Federal Reserve Board. Glancing at the document, we momentarily felt like Indiana Jones at the dramatic moment in which he discovers the Lost Ark of the Covenant.
We were tickled to find that the work’s introduction includes a discussion of soaring housing prices and their effect on consumer spending; it even anticipates a bursting housing bubble. Writes Greenspan: “There is no perpetual motion machine which generates an ever-rising path for the prices of homes.”
Greenspan, however, didn’t foresee a housing mania spilling into the general economy, toppling banks and brokerage houses and paralyzing key portions of the credit system. The worst he could anticipate was that a sharp “break in prices of existing homes would pull down the prices of new homes to the of construction costs or below, inducing a sharp contraction in building.” Back then, there were no home-equity lines of credit, derivatives or subprime mortgages. Mortgages were largely concentrated at savings and loans. Credit was harder to come by, too, because conventional mortgage rates were about 8.5% and headed significantly higher. Still, the thesis shows that the former Fed boss was focused on housing very early in his career. Thus, it casts doubt on his recent assertions about being surprised by the Mesozoic-era-size impact of this decade’s housing mania.
For the complete article click here: Looking At Greenspan’s Long Lost Thesis, Barron’s, April 28, 2008.
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: Alan Greenspan, Banks, Barron's, Credit, Derivatives, Economy, Excerpts, Fed, Federal Reserve, Focus, Housing Bubble, India, inflation, Markets, Monetary Policy, Mortgage, Ph. D., risk, Thesis
Posted in Credit Markets, Economy, Financials, Fixed Income, Gold, Markets, Monetary Policy, Politics, Satire, Strategy, inflation | No Comments »
Thursday, March 27th, 2008
Mar. 27, 2008 - In November 2008, Goldman Sachs’ Chief Global Strategist, Jim O’Neill, and associates, who coined the “BRICs” term, have followed up with a complete updated report on the fundamentals for each of Brazil, Russia, India and China. The report goes on to cover the markets of the Next 11 frontier markets. Click the following link to download the complete report, BRICs and Beyond (Goldman Sachs).
Here are some excerpts:
India’s rising growth potential
…We argue that there has been a structural increase in India’s potential growth rate since 2003 on the back of high productivity growth. In this paper, we explain why productivity (by which we mean total factor productivity, or the manner in which all inputs are combined to achieve more output) has surged, and why we think this is likely to continue over the next decade.
… Industry is increasingly becoming an important growth driver, contrary to conventional wisdom that growth in India is only services-led. A quarter of services are directly linked to industry, in sectors such as trade, transport, electricity and construction.
…In India, labour is nearly four times more productive in industry and six times more productive in services than in agriculture, where there is a surplus of labour. Economic theory tells us that as labour moves from low-productivity sectors (such as agriculture) to high-productivity sectors (such as industry or services), overall output must improve.
…In absolute terms India will remain a low-income country for several decades, with per capita incomes well below its BRIC peers. But if it can fulfil its growth potential, it can become a motor for the world economy and a key contributor to generating spending growth.
…India’s imminent urbanisation process has implications for demand for housing, urban infrastructure, location of retail and demand for consumer durables. We expect the coming onstream of major highways (especially the Golden Quadrilateral) to drive growth in the transportation sector, spur demand for vehicles, increase real estate values along the corridor and potentially boost construction of suburban homes as people escape congested cities. The SEZs hold out substantial investment opportunities in all spheres of activity.
Russia: A smooth political transition
…There are signs that investment has begun to accelerate over the last 12 months, with capital expenditures up over 21%yoy in 2007H1. Private investment growth may suffer a brief interruption due to the recent troubles in the local credit markets. But public investment may make up some of the shortfall: after repairing its balance sheet and accumulating a substantial ‘rainy-day’ fund, the government has announced ambitious plans to invest over $1-trillion over the next ten years in roads, rail, ports, pipelines and other infrastructure projects.
…The BRICs dream is not even a best case scenario in fact, Russia’s recent performance has been considerably better than projected in the original BRICs papers. But it does assume that the necessary conditions for long-run growth are in place, conditions that we have tried to capture in our Growth Environment Scores (GES). Russia scores well above the emerging market mean on education, government deficit and external debt; marginally above average on openness and life expectancy; lower but still above average on technology (phones, PCs and internet access per capita); and somewhat below average on inflation, which is now in the high single digits.
…Our equity strategists’ favourite themes are the consumer, telecoms and retail sectors, as well as steel and pipe companies, and other names poised to benefit from the state’s infrastructure spending. They also see opportunities in domestic restructuring stories, such as power generation and gas. With significant segments of the economy still private, we see considerable opportunities in direct investment.
China: Will China grow old before getting rich?
…China’s unrivalled economic growth over the past quarter-century has surpassed all records and created a new standard in the history of economic development. With an average annual real GDP growth rate of 9.6% from 1978 to 2004, China’s pace of growth is faster than that achieved by any East Asian economy during their fastest-growing periods.
China’s investment strength is sustainable
…One of the most widely-held misconceptions about China is that the economy contains an over-investment time-bomb, which will soon result in a sharp correction in both investment and GDP growth, resulting in rising non-performing loans (NPLs) and in deflation. The reasoning behind this theory is that fixed asset investment (FAI) is growing at above 20% year on year, while the investment-to-GDP ratio is already above 45% (higher than the levels reached by Asian economies before the 1997 crisis). Furthermore, this investment boom is financed by misallocated bank credits and generates few returns.
Although this is a popular view, we believe it is wrong for two reasons. First, the conclusion is based on macro data that is deeply flawed, leading to a substantial overstatement of the investment-to-GDP ratio. Second, a high investment-to-GDP ratio is consistent with China’s rapid growth. The fact that the return on capital is high and generally has been climbing over the past decade supports our thesis that Chinas investment strength is sustainable.
The “B” in BRICs: Unlocking Brazil’s growth potential
We remain confident about Brazil’s growth potential, at least in terms of what we have envisaged in our BRICs studies. The main reason for Brazil’s underperformance is that, until now, the government had been in the process of implementing a stabilisation programme, with a view to achieving macroeconomic stability. This is a key precondition for growth. Thanks to these adjustment efforts, macroeconomic conditions are more favourable now than they have been for decades. The large balance of payments surpluses have been used to prepay external debt and accumulate reserves, while a credible central bank (BACEN) has reduced inflation to 3.0% in 2006.
We believe that the Lula II administration will sustain sound macroeconomic policies and make some progress on structural reforms. Stability should allow real GDP growth rates to move gradually towards Brazil’s potential rate of about 3.5%, which is near our BRICs potential growth rate of 3.7%.
We also believe that Brazil could grow much faster, perhaps at a secular growth rate of about 5.0%. For this to happen, the government will have to tackle four difficult structural problems:
· Brazil saves and invests too little. To address this issue, the government will have to deepen and improve the quality of the fiscal adjustment.
· The economy should be opened to trade.
· The government must improve the overall quality of education.
· The government should implement structural reforms to improve institutions, with a view to increasing total factor productivity.
We do not believe that the Lula II administration and Congress will be ambitious enough to implement this politically difficult agenda. Therefore, while Brazil has the potential to grow at or above 5.0%, this is unlikely to happen during the next four years.
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: Agriculture, Asia, Brazil, BRICs, China, Credit, Credit Market, Credit Markets, dig, Economi, Economy, electricity, Emerging Market, Emerging Markets, Excerpts, GDP, GDP Growth, Gold, India, inflation, Infrastructure, Investment, Markets, Rally, Real Estate, risk, Russia, Thesis, Trillion, Value, wisdom
Posted in Markets | No Comments »
Sunday, February 3rd, 2008
Feb. 3, 2008 - The nature of the economic strength and stability of the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) countries is a less well known or understood fact among investors. There remains a wide gap between perceptions and reality.
Remember 1997 and 1998? Many investors, excited about the growth of Asian and emerging countries in the late nineties and invested their money found out about credit related risk first when the 1997 ‘Asian Contagion’ occurred and was followed upon by the Long Term Capital Management bailout which unfolded in 1998. These events destabilized global markets and investors were taken by surprise as markets melted down.
For this reason, its important to go back to that time and re-examine Malaysia and Thailand, as examples, of where investors were excited by the rapid economic growth, but ignored the then inherent high credit risk, much to their expense. A decade ago (yes, a decade ago) when all of this was happening, only 3% of the grand total of emerging markets sovereign debt was rated as investment grade by any of the ratings agencies.
In 1997, only 10 out of 120 companies that form the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, had ADRs.
Excited by the G7 debt-financed growth, investors made bets that were inherently risky to their preservation of capital, not simply volatile. Circa 1997, emerging markets were in debt to the industrialized world by about $100-billion in the current account deficit column, and dependent on the kindness of their G7 financiers.
When the Malay and Thai governments were unable to meet current account obligations, and started printing money in order to meet them, the Fed blew the whistle upon discovering that sufficient reserves were not available to support the currency valuations. Hence the overnight slashing of Asian currencies.
At best, the general sentiment surrounding emerging markets has remained sceptical, and for this reason, as fundamentally sound as the BRIC countries economies are today, the market has been adopting the BRIC investment story very gradually. This time though, it is credit worthiness that is being overlooked.
Source: Merrill Lynch October 2006
Source: Merrill Lynch, October 2006
Today, emerging markets sit atop a current account surplus in excess of $700-billion, and it is the industrialized G7 who are in debt, by the same amount. Longer term surpluses in excess of $3-trillion are to be found on the balance sheets of mostly the BRIC countries today in the form of Foreign Exchange surpluses, and trade surpluses. China alone now nurses a trade and forex surplus nearing US$1.5-tillion. Russia, has managed to build up reserves of US$450-billion as well as Putin’s US$150-billion ‘contigency’ fund, set aside so that it may sidestep any kind of financial shock. India has amassed a forex surplus of around US$275-billion. Brazil’s forex reserves now stand at US$178-billion.
BRIC countries have been financing the debt, and driving the growth of G7 countries for the last 5-7 years. China has emerged as the worlds manufacturing hub, while India has come on very strong as its counterpart hub in services, both providing Western firms access to inexpensive educated and -or- highly-skilled labour. Russia, under Putin, has successfully emerged as a highly profitable energy and raw materials producer, second in oil and gas reserves to Saudi Arabia. Brazil has changed the regional balance in the Americas by turning itself into the winds of east-west trade in hard and soft commodities and using its strength to bolster its new economic clout in relation to North America.
China’s growth is less dependent on the health of the US economy, as is commonly perceived. A recent Economist article points out that China’s true exports-to-GDP ratio is actually below 10%, that China has been quite successful to date at rebalancing its economy in favour of domestic growth as a driver. As for India, 87% of its GDP is consumed domestically, making it quite independent from the risk of the US threatened consumer hegemony. Russians are enjoying three times the disposable income of 7 years ago and driving consumption growth, as are Brazilians.
North American and European companies are looking to these consumers to drive demand and growth to their top and bottom lines.
In a word, things have changed.
They have changed in a very meaningful, very important way. The relationship that now exists between emerging markets and G7 countries is ‘symbiotic.’ and interdependent.
Source: Merrill Lynch, October 2006
Today, around 60-70% of emerging markets sovereign debt is investment grade rated and all 120 companies that form the key MSCI Emerging Markets Index have ADR listings.
In 1997-1998, the world’s biggest western banks took advantage of bailout conditions to take ownership of Asian banks, once protected by thousand-year-old protectionist laws. Today, powerful and wealthy Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) are bailing out the same banks, Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, and Morgan Stanley.
On Wall Street in the past few weeks, the sums have been bigger and the actions more benign—at least so far. This week Merrill Lynch and Citigroup became the latest to get the sovereign-wealth treatment, picking up a further $6.6 billion and $14.5 billion respectively, much of it from governments in Asia and the Middle East (see article). Sapped by the subprime crisis, rich-world financial-services groups have been administered nearly $69 billion-worth of infusions from the savings of the developing world in the past ten months, according to Morgan Stanley.
Commodities are not the only source of sovereign wealth. Many Asian emerging markets have been running current-account surpluses at the same time as they have been managing their exchange rates. As they have mopped up dollars, using government bonds, they have accumulated reserves. At first these went into safe, liquid assets like American Treasury bonds—the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98 was still a recent memory and many countries were keen to amass reserves. But economies like China, South Korea and Taiwan now have more reserves than they need to defend themselves against shocks. Their governments understandably want to earn a higher return than Treasury bonds will pay, so they create a fund to manage their assets. Source: The Economist, Jan. 17, 2008, Asset-Backed Insecurity
It has become such that neither Emerging Markets nor the G7 can allow each other to be destabilized, as evidenced by the large, noted, SWF investments, as they have each other’s economic ‘lives’ in the balance.
You might get the idea that emerging markets are correlated more to the US than they actually are, when you see that they have suffered like western stock markets, from a selloff. Their correlation is low, between .30 and .40, not zero or negative. There are those who would have us believe that the decoupling thesis is suffering from the same disease as the bull market. Those are probably the same folks, who last year began to re-write their theses from decoupling to recoupling to suit themselves this year, as the need to raise cash by selling the last two year’s profitable trades became an increasingly inevitable requirement, in order to shore up balance sheets.
Our expectation is that the credit squeeze ailing the market will come to a reversal point, at some point over the next 2-4 weeks as the banks round the corner on the cash call that has forced the wholesale liquidation of emerging markets and commodities related investing.
Emerging Markets are strong, and some of their [inflationary] growth pressures may get somewhat solved by a slowdown in the US, in the form of an imported soft landing. This is by no means advice, but if you subscribe to this thesis, then there is reason (for those of us on the buy-side) to believe that there will be a recovery in the decoupling thesis, and thus emerging markets equities throughout the second half of the year, from the current lows.
First, however, until the cash call is complete, and the future of the monoline insurers (MBIA, ABK) is resolved in the form of perhaps a bailout, we may continue to see more downside.
Now may prove to be a good time to nibble at emerging markets and commodities again and add or gain exposure as they are far more attractively priced. Here are a variety of ETFs and open ended funds (Canadian fund companies with offerings) that provide broad (diversified) and narrow exposure (country and regional funds) to BRIC and emerging markets.
On the AMEX
“Total” Emerging Markets ETFs
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index Fund (EEM)
PowerShares FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Portfolio (PXH)
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ETF (GMM)
Vanguard Emerging Markets ETF (VWO)
Dividend Emerging Markets ETFs
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High-Yielding Fund (DEM)
Multi-Region (but not Total) Emerging Markets ETFs
BLDRS Emerging MKTS 50 ADR Index Fund (ADRE)
Claymore/BNY BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) ETF (EEB)
streetTRACKS SPDR S&P BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) 40 ETF (BIK)
iShares MSCI BRIC Index Fund (BKF)
Latin America Regional ETFs
iShares S&P Latin America 40 Index Fund (ILF)
SPDR S&P Emerging Latin America ETF (GML)
European Emerging Markets Regional ETFs
SPDR S&P Emerging Europe ETF (GUR)
Middle East and Africa Regional ETFs
SPDR S&P Emerging Middle East & Africa ETF (GAF)
India - Barclays iPath India ETN (INP)
On the Toronto Stock Exchange
Claymore BRIC ETF (CBQ.T)
Open Ended Funds (Canadian)
Broad Mandate Emerging Markets
Tmpleton Emerging Markets
AGF Emerging Markets
Pro FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index
TD Emerging Markets
United-Emerging Markets Pool Cl A
CI Emerging Markets
United-Emerging Markets Pool Cl W
BMO Emerging Markets
Brandes Emerging Markets Equity
CIBC Emerging Markets Index
National Bank Emerging Markets
Region/Country Mandates
Excel India Fund
Excel China Fund
Excel Chindia Fund
Excel Emerging Europe Fund
Templeton BRIC Fund
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: ABK, Amp, Asia, Bailout, Banks, Blog, BMO, Brazil, BRICs, China, CIBC, Citigroup, Commodities, Consumption, Correlation, Credit, Credit Market, Credit Risk, Currency, de-coupling, Dollar, Economi, Economy, Emerging Market, Emerging Markets, energy, ETF, Euro, Fed, FTSE, GDP, Government Bonds, India, inflation, Investment, Latin America, Long Term Capital, Long Term Capital Management, Malaysia, Markets, oil, Oil and Gas, Recession, risk, Russia, Slowdown, South Korea, Stock Markets, SWFs, Taiwan, Thesis, Trillion, Valuations, Wall Street, wisdom
Posted in Markets | No Comments »
Tuesday, January 29th, 2008
Jan. 29, 2008 - This is irresistible. During periods where there seems to be such confusion in the market, we could certainly all use a dose of clarity.
Byron Wien, Chief Global Strategist, Pequot Capital, and one of a few prolific market forecasters, shares his 5 ‘Sure Things’ for this turbulent market:
I’m getting older now, so I only invest in sure things. I don’t invest in things that only “might” work out. So let me give you five sure things.
-
Gold is going to $1,000 an ounce probably this year. I forecast that it would go to $800 an ounce last year.
-
Oil is going to probably $125 a barrel. I forecast that it would go to $80 last year. The dollar is going down for the reasons that I said because large holders of dollars are going to diversify into other assets and other currencies.
-
Cotton is going to be the commodity of choice because the world’s standard of living is increasing and the places where it’s increasing fastest are warm and they don’t wear wool, they wear cotton. Cotton is something nobody wants to grow. They want to grow corn instead. So, while the demand for cotton is increasing, the acreage devoted to it is decreasing and that’s all you have to know.
-
Finally, I think the Chinese are going to revalue the renminbi (yuan) even more than the seven percent that they did last year.
-
As far as stocks are concerned, I think that my investment ideas follow some of my thesis. Our portfolio is very heavily overseas, but we’re in the agricultural area with
Potash Corp (POT) and a lot of energy stocks.
-
Large caps such as
Schlumberger (SLB). Smaller caps such as
National Oilwell Varco (NOV) and Ultra Petroleum (UPL). In technology,
Qualcomm (QCOM). Finally, in adult education we think that a lot of people will be laid off and they’ll be trying to improve their skills so we would buy the
Apollo Group (APOL).
Prior to his current position as Chief Investment Strategist at Pequot Capital, Byron Wien was Chief Global Strategist at Morgan Stanley.
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: Agriculture, Canadian Stocks, Commodities, Commodity, COT, Currency, Dollar, Economy, Emerging Markets, energy, energy stocks, EUM, Gold, India, Investment, Investment Strategy, Investment Wisdom, oil, Russia, Thesis, US Stocks, Value, Yuan
Posted in ETFs | No Comments »
Friday, January 4th, 2008
Barry Ritholtz’s blog The Big Picture featured this story today, Non-Farm Payroll (jobs) grew by a stunningly disappointing 18,000, which further reinforces the likelyhood the Fed will cut, probably by at least 50bps at the next FOMC meeting, on the back of this recessionary news.
Mr. Ritholtz’s highly acclaimed blog is by far one of the best on the web.
Wow, that’s a pretty ugly chart above.
Here are the details, via BLS:
“The unemployment rate rose to 5.0 percent in December, while nonfarm payroll employment was essentially unchanged (+18,000), the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor reported today.
Job growth in several service-providing industries, including professional and technical services, health care, and food services, was largely offset by job losses in construction and manufacturing. Average hourly earnings rose by 7 cents, or 0.4 percent.”
So, December NF Payrolls rose much less than expected, up a marginal 18,000 — or as BLS described it, largely unchanged – versus a consensus of 70,000. This was the lowest reading since August 2003. Construction job losses are now finding their way into the data, regardless of the aforementioned Birth Death adjustment.
Unemployment rate rose to 5.0%, the highest in 26 months. As we have noted repeatedly in past months, to keep up with population growth requires ~150k new jobs to be created each month. Given the number of months we have seen below that level, an uptick in unemployment was inevitable.
The spin coming from the usual sources will be that this poor showing was the result of the August credit crunch, and is therefore likely to be a temporary phenomena.
I disagree.
These same folks will point to the increasing odds of a 50 bps cut at the January meeting. Those futures have risen to 44% from 36% yesterday. Unfortunately, the Fed finds itself somewhat hamstrung by elevated inflation, $100 Oil and $850 Gold as signs proof of inflation.
~~~
Coming on top of the slowing Housing market, weak income levels, ISM manufacturing index, and auto sales, this is further evidence to the building thesis that a recession is increasingly likely.Sources:Employment Situation Summary
BLS, DECEMBER 2007
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
BLS, DECEMBER 2007http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm BLS, DECEMBER 2007http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
Fed’s Inflation Fears Might Trump
Calls for Another Big Rate Cut Monetary-Policy Makers
Appear to Have Less Room To Maneuver Than in Past
GREG IP
WSJ, January 4, 2008; Page A3
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119940394997266181.html
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: Barry Ritholtz, Blog, Chart, Credit, Credit Market, Desc, Earnings, Economy, Fed, Gold, Housing Market, inflation, New Jobs, oil, Recession, REW, risk, The Big Picture, Thesis
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
Updated Twice Daily - Click to Listen