Posts Tagged ‘Emerging Markets’
Heebner and Holmes on Emerging Markets
Saturday, November 1st, 2008
Click image for video
Ken Heebner, CGM Funds, and Frank Holmes, US Global Investors, discuss emerging markets in the context of the Fed’s 50 bps rate cut last week. Both their remarks on the rate cut and emerging markets are noteworthy.
Ken Heebner, CGM Funds: “Well, the emerging market economies are going to continue to have long-term growth. Those are the markets down the most, they’re down 50, in some places 60 percent and long term they have a bright future. Even Jeremy Grantham, the mega… the bear, is saying they’re almost cheap enough for him to buy. … When he’s ready to buy something, it’s going to go up.”
Frank Holmes, US Global Investors: “Well, I do like the emerging markets and I think if you look at energy names like PetroChina, it’s been just devastated here in stock price and it has a huge upside to get back to basically a healthier equilibrium and P/E ratios. But remember that most of these emerging markets, unlike 10 years ago Erin, they have, like China has $2 trillion of U.S. dollars…so they have a huge (foreign reserve) surpluses to be able to reinvigorate their economies. …I totally agree with Ken, this is where growth opportunities lie.”
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: China, Dollar, Emerging Markets, energy, Fed, Frank Holmes, Markets, Silver, Video
Posted in Markets | No Comments »
BRICs Lay Foundation Stability: Merrill Lynch
Thursday, October 30th, 2008
Alex Patelis, Head of Global Economics, Merrill Lynch discusses the strength of BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) countries in the midst of the global credit crisis, and how well suited they are to recover strongly.
Patelis points out that close to 90% of global GDP growth will come from emerging markets economies in 2009, and goes one step further saying that he would not be surprised if global growth would come exclusively from emerging markets. They are underlevered, strong domestic economies, where consumption growth is being fuelled by income growth, and strong savings rates. In particular, he favours China and India.
Click image to watch video
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: Brazil, BRICs, China, Credit, Credit Crisis, Economics, Emerging Markets, GDP Growth, India, Markets, Russia, Savings Rate, Video
Posted in Markets | No Comments »
Resurgent Yen a Global Destabilizer
Wednesday, October 29th, 2008
Once again, volatility favouring the Japanese Yen is having a pronounced effect on what happens in the stock market. There is a well documented history of the relationship that exists between global stock markets and the Yen. There appears to be a well-defined negative correlation between the yen and equity markets. When the yen surges, markets fall, and vice versa.
We have covered this topic on several occasions during this year:
- The Carry Trade and Markets? What is the relationship?,
- Resurgent Yen is Scary News,
- Why the selloff in commodities and emerging markets?,
- More Carry-Trade commentary
- More volatility coming and more ETF options
- Yen’s Strength [has been] profoundly negative for global markets
From the Economic Times, The Group of Seven issued warnings on Monday the yen’s wild swings are threatening financial stability, fanning speculation central banks may intervene to halt a rally in the currency driven by a Japanese exodus from emerging markets.
The yen was the only currency mentioned in a brief G7 statement as it rallied to 13-year high against the dollar, not only threatening Japanese exports as the world’s second-largest economy tumbles toward recession amid the worst global financial crisis in 80 years, but leading to a destabilization of currency related transactions that need to be unwound.
As a matter of background building, we provide below a summary of milestones in the yen’s history:
1871 - The yen became Japan’s currency as part of the Meiji Restoration, which marked the start of Japan’s modernization and opening to the rest of the world. Japan adopted the gold standard.
1949 - After World War Two the dollar’s fixed rate is set at 360 yen via the Bretton Woods system, partly to help stabilize prices in the Japanese economy.
1959 - The dollar/yen exchange rate is liberalized and the margin of fluctuation is set at 0.5 percent on either side of its dollar parity.
1963 - The margin of fluctuation is widened to 0.75 percent. 1971 - United States abandons gold standard, bringing an end to the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates and forcing a realignment of world currencies.
December 1971 - Under the Smithsonian Agreement, the dollar/yen exchange rate is set at 308 yen and is allowed to fluctuate in a wider band between 301.07 yen and 314.93 yen.
1973 - Japanese monetary authorities decide to let the yen float freely against the dollar, and the yen appreciates as far as 263 to the dollar.
1978 - The yen pushes through 200 to the dollar for the first time, strengthening as far as 177.
1980 to 1985 - The yen’s appreciation halts and partially reverses despite Japan’s big trade surpluses. Higher interest rates in the United States prompt Japanese investors to put money in dollar assets.
1985 - The Group of Five industrial nations, the predecessor to the G7, sign the Plaza Accord in which they agree the dollar is overvalued and to weaken it. The yen climbs from its pre-accord level of around 240 to 211 in October and 200 in November, a 20 percent rise in just a few months.
1986 - The U.S. currency falls further to around 190 yen in January, 167 yen in April and 153 yen in August.
1987 - In February, six of the G7 nations sign the Louvre Accord, which aims to stabilize currencies and halt the dollar’s broad decline. The dollar still falls from near 153 to 137 in April and 120.80 by the end of the year.
1988 - On January 4, the dollar falls to a post-war low of 120.45 yen in Tokyo trade, a level that holds as the low for more than five years. The Bank of Japan intervenes to buy dollars and sell yen that day on behalf of the Ministry of Finance.
August 17, 1993 - The dollar declines to a new post-war low of 100.40 yen in Tokyo.
June 21, 1994 - The dollar falls through the key 100 yen level and touches a record postwar low of 99.85 yen in New York trade before finishing at 100.30 yen.
April 19, 1995 - The dollar hits a record post-war low at 79.75 yen after U.S.-Japanese trade frictions spark heavy selling. By the end of the year it is near 103.40.
June 17, 1998 - As the dollar shoots above 144 yen, U.S. authorities join the Bank of Japan to buy yen, spending $833 million. By August the dollar rises to near 148 yen, partly due to yen carry trades in which investors borrow yen funds at Japan’s near zero interest rates to buy higher-yielding currencies.
1998 - After the global financial market strains from the near collapse of hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management, carry trades are unwound quickly. In one week alone in October, the dollar tumbles from near 136 yen to a low around 111.50 yen.
1999 - The yen strengthens further despite repeated intervention, reaching 102 in November.
2001 - Following the Sept 11 attacks, Bank of Japan intervenes to sell yen for dollars.
2003 - The MOF begins massive intervention to halt the yen’s rise against the dollar, partly to shield Japanese exporters as the economy remains stuck in its post-bubble slump and deflation. The MOF spends 20.4 trillion yen ($200 billion) over the year, nearly all of it to buy dollars and sell yen.
2004 - The MOF spends 14.8 trillion yen ($145 billion) intervening in the first quarter of the year, including 1.67 trillion yen buying dollars on January 9 alone. But the MOF ceases intervention in March and has never since resumed.
2005 - The yen reaches a high of 101.67 yen in January but then starts to fall, hitting 121.40 in December. Yen carry trades and Japanese investors shifting funds into foreign assets drive the slide.
June 2007 - The dollar hits a 4-1/2-year high of 124.14 yen. July 2007 - The yen’s broad depreciation takes it to a 22-year low on a real effective exchange rate basis. Since January 2005 the yen has lost 25 percent of its value on a REER basis.
August 2007 - Strains in financial markets from the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis spark an unwind of yen carry trades.
The dollar falls from near 120 yen to 111.60 yen. The high-yielding Australian and New Zealand dollars tumble nearly 10 percent.
March 13, 2008 - The yen hits an 12-year high of 99.77.
October 24, 2008 - Yen hits 13-year high of 90.87 versus the dollar, while setting an all-time high against the Australian dollar of 55.11, with the Aussie losing almost a third of its value in just a month on a massive unwind of carry trades.
October 27, 2008 - The yen’s surge to 13-year highs prompts the G7 to issue statement to single out the yen in warning on currency market volatility.
The yen has surged nearly 20 percent so far in October on a trade weighted basis, more than twice as big as any month going back to 1970, including the carry trade collapse in October 1998 and the Plaza Accord to weaken the dollar in 1985.
(Sources: Reuters, Bank of Japan, Bank of England)
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: Australia, Banks, Carry Trade, Commodities, Correlation, Currency, Dollar, Economy, Emerging Markets, ETF, Gold, interest rates, Japan, Markets, Mortgage, Recession, SMI, Value
Posted in Markets | No Comments »
Mobius: Brazil will Lead Recovery
Wednesday, October 29th, 2008
In a webcast interview with Times Online UK, Mark Mobius discusses why he believes Brazil will lead the recovery in Emerging Markets.
Press Play to listen here:
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: Brazil, Emerging Markets, Mark Mobius, Markets, UK
Posted in Markets | No Comments »
Bob Farrell’s “10 Rules For Investing”
Saturday, August 16th, 2008
Bob Farrell, a legend at Merrill Lynch for several decades, had a front-row seat to the go-go markets of the late 1960s, mid-1980s and late 1990s, and the brutal bear market of 1973-74, and October 1987’s crash.
He retired as chief stock market analyst at the end of 1992, but continued to occasionally publish. Rumor has it for a humongous donation to Farrell’s favorite charity, you can get on his very exclusive email list.
Marketwatch gathered some of Farrell’s more famous observations, and republished them as “10 Market Rules to Remember.”
1. Markets tend to return to the mean over time
When stocks go too far in one direction, they come back. Euphoria and pessimism can cloud people’s heads. It’s easy to get caught up in the heat of the moment and lose perspective.
2. Excesses in one direction will lead to an opposite excess in the other direction
Think of the market baseline as attached to a rubber string. Any action to far in one direction not only brings you back to the baseline, but leads to an overshoot in the opposite direction.
3. There are no new eras — excesses are never permanent
Whatever the latest hot sector is, it eventually overheats, mean reverts, and then overshoots. Look at how far the emerging markets and BRIC nations ran over the past 6 years, only to get a sizable haircut.
As the fever builds, a chorus of “this time it’s different” will be heard, even if those exact words are never used. And of course, it — Human Nature — never is different.
4. Exponential rapidly rising or falling markets usually go further than you think, but they do not correct by going sideways
Regardless of how hot a sector is, don’t expect a plateau to work off the excesses. Profits are locked in by selling, and that invariably leads to a significant correction — eventually.
5. The public buys the most at the top and the least at the bottom
That’s why contrarian-minded investors can make good money if they follow the sentiment indicators and have good timing.
Watch Investors Intelligence (measuring the mood of more than 100 investment newsletter writers) and the American Association of Individual Investors survey.
6. Fear and greed are stronger than long-term resolve
Investors can be their own worst enemy, particularly when emotions take hold. Gains “make us exuberant; they enhance well-being and promote optimism,” says Santa Clara University finance professor Meir Statman. His studies of investor behavior show that “Losses bring sadness, disgust, fear, regret. Fear increases the sense of risk and some react by shunning stocks.”
7. Markets are strongest when they are broad and weakest when they narrow to a handful of blue-chip names
Hence, why breadth and volume are so important. Think of it as strength in numbers. Broad momentum is hard to stop, Farrell observes. Watch for when momentum channels into a small number of stocks (”Nifty 50″ stocks).
8. Bear markets have three stages — sharp down, reflexive rebound and a drawn-out fundamental downtrend
I would suggest that as of August 2008, we are on our third reflexive rebound — the Januuary rate cuts, the Bear Stearns low in March, and now the Fannie/Freddie rescue lows of July.
Even when these sporadic rallies end, we have yet to see the long drawn out fundamental portion of the Bear Market.
9. When all the experts and forecasts agree — something else is going to happen
As Stovall, the S&P investment strategist, puts it: “If everybody’s optimistic, who is left to buy? If everybody’s pessimistic, who’s left to sell?”
Going against the herd as Farrell repeatedly suggests can be very profitable, especially for patient buyers who raise cash from frothy markets and reinvest it when sentiment is darkest.
10. Bull markets are more fun than bear markets
Especially if you are long only or mandated to be full invested. Those with more flexible charters might squeek out a smile or two here and there.
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: Bear Stearns, BRICs, Chart, Emerging Markets, Markets, SMI
Posted in Markets | 2 Comments »
Asset Class Correlations
Sunday, August 10th, 2008
July 22, 2008 - July 21’s Wall Street Journal had an interesting article about asset class correlations. With that in mind, below we highlight (click here for PDF) a correlation matrix of various asset classes including the S&P 500 sectors, oil, gold, the dollar, the yen, emerging markets, the 10-year note and the FTSE 100. The first matrix highlights the correlation between the daily percent changes of asset classes since the S&P 500 peaked on October 9th, 2007. Each column (vertical) is color coded from green to red based on highest to lowest correlations.
The second matrix highlights the correlations between the same asset classes, only from a much longer time horizon (1990-present). Then, in the bottom chart, we highlight the difference between the short-term and long-term correlations to see where differences arise. Correlations that have increased since the bear market began in 10/07 are shaded in light green, while correlations that have decreased are shaded in light red. In each column, the biggest increase and decrease in correlation is highlighted in dark green or red. As shown, correlations have generally increased among sectors, while stocks have become less correlated with oil, gold and Treasuries. Correlations between stocks and the yen have increased the most in the short-term compared to their long-term correlations. To view the matrices in PDF form, please click here. It’s definitely an interesting data set to analyze and it’s better to let the info speak for itself.
Thanks Bespoke.
(Courtesy: Bespoke Investment Group)
MEDIA ENCLOSURE: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GreenlightadvisorBlog/~5/343022913/acc-bespoke.pdf
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: asset class, Chart, Correlation, Dollar, Emerging Markets, energy, FTSE, Gold, Markets, S&P 500
Posted in Markets | No Comments »
Where is the Boom, and the Doom?
Tuesday, July 1st, 2008
July 1, 2008 - The first half of this year has been chaotic and confusing for investors given the Subprime fiasco and rapid deterioration of fundamentals in the Banking and Finance sectors, the secular selloff in stocks globally, recession in the US, and soaring oil and commodity prices.
US Global Investors, an American mutual fund company, founded by Toronto native, Frank Holmes, interviews Dr. Marc Faber, author of the Gloom, Boom, and Doom Report, for 1:15 hrs in this highly informative webcast (courtesy of Investment Postcards) aptly titled, “Where is the Boom, Gloom and Doom?”
Please click here to listen to the webcast.
Source: US Global Investors, June 27, 2008.
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: BRICs, China, Commodities, Emerging Markets, energy, Frank Holmes, GDP Growth, globalization, GloomBoomDoom, India, Infrastructure, Marc Faber, urbanization
Posted in Agriculture, BRIC, Brazil, China, Commodities, Credit Markets, Eastern Europe, Emerging Markets, Financials, India, Markets, energy | No Comments »
Bill Gross: Hmmmm? (Investment Outlook June 2008)
Monday, May 26th, 2008
May 26, 2008 - Pimco’s Bill Gross makes a most humorous analyses, drawing parallels that the hordes are marching on the new Rome (America), and that its time to act. Make sure you read this must read, the June 2008 Investment Outlook, by Bill Gross. At the end, Gross puts forth his recommendations.
What this country needs is either a good 5 cent cigar or the reincarnation of an Illinois “rail-splitter” willing to tell the American people “what up” -”what really up.” We have for so long now been willing to be entertained rather than informed, that we more or less accept majority opinion, perpetually shaped by ratings obsessed media, at face value. After 12 months of an endless primary campaign barrage, for instance, most of us believe that a candidate’s preacher - Democrat or Republican - should be a significant factor in how we vote. We care more about who’s going to be eliminated from this week’s American Idol than the deteriorating quality of our healthcare system. Alternative energy discussion takes a bleacher’s seat to the latest foibles of Lindsay Lohan or Britney Spears and then we wonder why gas is four bucks a gallon. We care as much as we always have - we just care about the wrong things: entertainment, as opposed to informed choices; trivia vs. hardcore ideological debate.)
It’s Sunday afternoon at the Coliseum folks, and all good fun, but the hordes are crossing the Alps and headed for modern day Rome - better educated, harder working, and willing to sacrifice today for a better tomorrow. Can it be any wonder that an estimated 1% of America’s wealth migrates into foreign hands hands every year? We, as a people, are overweight, poorly educated, overindulged, and imbued with such a sense or self importance on a geopolitical scale, that our allies are dropping like flies. “Yes we can?” Well, if so, then the “we” is the critical element, not the leader that will be chosen in November. Let’s get off the couch and shape up-physically, intellectually, and institutionally-and begin to make some informed choices about our future. Lincoln didn’t say it, but might have agreed, that the worst part about being fooled is fooling yourself, and as a nation, we’ve been doing a pretty good job of that for a long time now.
Bill Gross - Investment Outlook - June 2008 - “Hmmmmm”
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: Bill Gross, BRICs, Emerging Markets, Fixed Income, Hordes, inflation, Investment Wisdom, Markets, philosophy, PIMCO
Posted in BRIC, Brazil, CPI, China, Commodities, Economy, Emerging Markets, Financials, Geo-political, India, Infrastructure, Markets, Oil & Gas, Politics, Russia, US Stocks, inflation | No Comments »
Jerome Booth: Global Rebalancing to Favour Emerging Markets (FT.com)
Monday, May 12th, 2008
May 12, 2008 - Jerome Booth, Head of Research at Ashmore Investment Management, UK, has written an insightful article for FT.com, Insight: A Global Rebalancing Act, May 12, 2008. Here are a few excerpts:
Gross national savings are over 30 per cent of GDP on average in emerging countries, and for a decade private and official savers in these countries have been investing overseas – in the US and Europe – under the impression that these were safer markets than at home. Yet the dollar is far from the safest currency and not the store of value it was. US Treasuries are not zero risk – the implicit myth in the term “the risk-free rate”. Treasuries have currency, curve and volatility risks. Investors in triple A structured credit got a shock when they realised their investment was risky.
Likewise emerging market savers are getting a shock about Treasuries and other US and European assets. The money is returning home, and the move is structural, not cyclical. The global imbalance of a negative US personal savings rate on the one hand being financed by high emerging savings on the other is starting to reverse.
With this reversal, or rebalancing, is coming, we believe, a currency realignment and a series of investment booms across emerging economies as investment focus shifts. Rather than using “decoupling” in describing the impact of the credit crunch on emerging markets, we should use “negative correlation”.
The policy asymmetry between the US and emerging markets is that the emerging markets, with undervalued currencies, have an additional degree of freedom. They have the choice to mess up (do nothing) or control inflation (let the currency rise, raise interest rates). In our view, emerging market central banks will largely pass this test and do the sensible thing, though this is not what the market appears to have priced in yet.
As recently as ten years ago, emerging markets still held their hands out for development loans and foreign aid. Today, their fiscal prudence and wealth has put them in the position of bailing out the western banking system.
Why are investors taking so long to realize this critical distinction and its meaning?
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: Ashmore Investment Management, BRICs, Emerging Markets, Jerome Booth, Markets, Savings Rate
Posted in Brazil, China, Commodities, Emerging Markets, Financials, India, Latin America, Markets, Russia | No Comments »
Don Coxe’s Recommendations (Basic Points, 04/29/2008)
Monday, May 5th, 2008
May 5, 2008 – Here we feature the recommendations of Don Coxe, BMO Capital’s Chief Investment Strategist. As usual, his paragraphs are eloquent and provide significant guidance.
Don Coxe’s Investment Recommendations, excerpted from Basic Points, The Hinge of History II, April 29, 2008
1. In long-only equity portfolios, continue to underweight Wall Street banks and others that have been reporting high exposure to perfumed products of indeterminable value, including those which last year revealed—under duress— high exposure to SIVs. Within the financials, emphasize those whose loan losses are of the traditional, cyclical variety—not in derivatives or in untraditional banking businesses. Good banks that have stuck to their knitting—and whose CEOs compensation has suffered along with their stock prices—should be retained.
2. In long/short portfolios, be long commodity stocks and short bank stocks that make headlines for untraditional losses. That trade hasn’t been working lately, but it remains an overall portfolio risk-reducer. The list of banks that have shown great skill and profitability by going heavily into new kinds of products and new kinds of accounting is roughly as long as the list of major copper, oil and gas producers that profited by selling heavily forward.
3. A financial-led bear market within a financial-led recession can be particularly perilous if central banks run out of ways to reflate the system—and surprisingly benign if the central banks’ rescues remain timely. To date, the central banks have been up to the job—if propping up a badly-behaving financial sector is a key component of their job descriptions. Result: the overall stock market has outperformed our expectations. We still don’t like the risk/reward ratio.
4. Dividends become more attractive as central banks cut rates. The problem for investors is that many of “The Great Dividend-Paying Stocks” are financials that have been reporting ghastly blunders. In many cases, their payout ratios have climbed far above the 50% threshold that has made these stocks better investments than bonds. Opportunities remain—and dividends may be the only positive return most US stocks will deliver this year.
5. Although North American consumers have yet to see the cost pass-through in major foodstuffs of $6 corn and $8 wheat, it will come sooner or later. Based on past periods of food inflation, one of the first consumer cutbacks is on eating out. Restaurant stocks are especially unappetizing when food costs soar out of control.
6. Gold has pulled back from its high because the dollar stopped falling and the bank bailouts seem to be working. Remain overweight gold as a clear-cut hedge against further bad news on both those fronts.
7. The Canadian dollar decoupled from the euro, failing to rally to new peaks—which makes little sense to us. US clients should continue to use Canadian government bonds and Canadian short-term investments as alternatives to Treasuries and US cash.
8. Within the commodity group, continue to accumulate the leading agricultural stocks. Given the spectacular performance of the fertilizer stocks, the best bargains currently on offer are in the farm machinery companies. The global food crisis will almost surely cripple the opposition to GM seeds, which means the seed stocks have great upside room.
9. Within debt portfolios, continue to emphasize inflation hedge bonds—preferably in strong currencies. Treasuries remain overvalued, despite the recent strong run-up in yields from barely-observable levels.
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: Agricultural commodities, Agriculture, Bank stocks, BMO Capital Markets, Commodities, Donald Coxe, Emerging Markets, energy, Financials, Grain prices, Investment Strategy, Markets
Posted in Agriculture, Banks, Commodities, Credit Markets, Crude Oil, Economy, Financials, Fixed Income, India, Markets, contango, energy, gold stocks, inflation | 1 Comment »
Jim Rogers: Bullish China and Commodities
Sunday, April 13th, 2008
In this week’s Barron’s interview (Jim Rogers, Light-Years Ahead of the Crowd: Interview With James B. Rogers, Private Investor), with Laurence Strauss of Barron’s, Jim Rogers, author of Investment Biker, notable hedge fund manager and former partner of George Soros discusses his point of view on China, commodities, and the US economy. Here are some excerpts: On China:
Why are you so bullish on China?
China is going to be the next great country. The 19th century was the century of the U.K. The 20th century was the century of the U.S. The 21st century is going to be the century of China. Even if I’m wrong, there are 1.5 billion people who speak Chinese every day, so it’s not as if our daughter is learning Danish. Even if she winds up working in a Chinese restaurant, she is going to be the maitre d’ — not the dish washer.
What else intrigues you about China?
China was in decline for 300 years and then around 1978 Deng Xiaoping said, “OK, let’s find something new.” He reintroduced entrepreneurship and capitalism to a country that has had a long, long history of both. In China they save and invest more than 35% of their income; in America we save less than 2%. The Chinese work from dawn to dusk. When they come to work, they don’t say, “How many holidays do I get?” They want to live like we do in America and they are willing to work hard, save and invest for the future.
What about investment opportunities in China?
Perhaps the safest investment is the renminbi, the Chinese currency. I don’t see how the renminbi should not go up against the dollar, anyway, for the next several decades. Commodities, of course, are a great way to invest in China. If you have nickel, they will take you to dinner, pay for dinner and pay you on time. They have to buy commodities. And there are some industries in China that are going to do well, no matter what happens to the world economy — water treatment, for instance. China has a horrible water problem that it is doing something about.
What other industries in China look interesting?
Agriculture. Mao Zedong [who ruled China from 1949 until his death in 1976] totally ruined agriculture. China now is spending huge amounts of money trying to rebuild agriculture. The same goes for power generation. Another growing industry is tourism; the Chinese have not been able to travel for some 300 years, for a variety of reasons. But now the government is making it much easier to get passports, and they are encouraging travel.
On Commodities:
Are we still in the early stages of a bull market for commodities?
I wouldn’t say it’s early; the commodities bull market started in early 1999. There are going to be corrections — and big ones — along the way. That’s true for every bull market.
But nobody has brought on any new supply of anything in the past 25 or 30 years. The last gigantic oil field was discovered in the 1960s. The number of acres devoted to wheat farming has been declining for more than 30 years. Food inventories are the lowest they’ve been in 60 years.
Our colleague Gene Epstein argued in a recent Barron’s cover story that there is a huge speculative element pushing up commodities prices.
But where is the oil coming from that’s going to drive down prices and keep them down? We are going to have corrections, as was the case in 2001 after 9/11. Is there speculation in commodities? Of course. Whenever you have a bull market, it draws money. If the fundamentals are right, investors make money and they want to make more. But people were buying commodities for 20 years in the 1980s and 1990s and nothing happened, because the fundamentals weren’t right yet. Now that the fundamentals are right, more money is going into commodities. It will end in a bubble and hysteria. But in 2018, or whenever this bubble finally starts to peak, if I’m lucky you will call me up and I’ll say it’s time to sell commodities.
On Emerging Markets:
Why have you sold most of your emerging market holdings?
Take Africa as an example. It’s a natural- resource-based economy, so a huge fortune is going to be made there in the next 10 years. Many countries will look a lot better because they do have lots of natural resources.
Having said that, right now there are probably 15,000 MBAs on airplanes flying around the world looking for emerging markets, some of which are now called frontier markets. I’ve been investing in these markets for many years and all of a sudden they have a name. That’s why I have sold all my emerging markets except China and Taiwan.
But I hope I’m smart enough that if and when there is a big correction, I’ll be able to buy back some of those holdings.
We’ve seen the correction in emerging markets…
Finally, a comment on the US economy as a debtor nation…
As recently as 1987 the U.S. was a creditor nation. We are now the largest debtor nation the world has ever seen. We owe trillions. That’s with a “t.” The real problem is that that our foreign debt is increasing at a rate of $1 trillion every 15 months. You can do the arithmetic.
For a complete transcript of this article click this link: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=132805
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: Agriculture, China, Commodities, Currency, Emerging Markets, Markets, Metals, US Stocks
Posted in Markets | No Comments »
GE Revenue Growth Lights The Way for Investors
Friday, April 11th, 2008
Today’s disappointing earnings from GE not only highlighted the company’s losses due to its exposure to marked down debt, the poor performance of financial markets, and that the company was caught off guard by the Bear Stearns blow-up; it highlighted that it continues to see strong revenue growth from global market, and in particular, 38% topline growth in revenues from Emerging Markets. GE CEO, Jeff Immelt, was contrite about GE Capital’s writedowns, as well as the slowdown in the company’s Healthcare and Appliances divisions. The stong areas of growth for the company came from the Capital Goods and Infrastructure.
Immelt said the company’s financial services unit was caught off guard by the demise of investment bank giant Bear Stearns and was hampered by the poor performance of the broader financial sector. GE is the parent company of CNBC.com.
…He remains particularly confident in overseas sales. GE revenue grew 38 percent in emerging markets.
“It gives you a sense that outside the United States we’re just not seeing a slowdown yet,” he said. “I don’t think we can assume that everything grows to the sky forever and we’re not counting on that kind of robust international sales, particularly in the shorter-cycle businesses. But the global markets remain robust and the industrial businesses remain robust.”
It was interesting to see Joe Kernen, in advance of the interview, opine that it would be all bad news from Jeff Immelt. The Squawk team did a pretty good job of drilling their CEO, whom they tend to be tough on, since CNBC is owned by GE.
Here is the link to the CNBC story and the video of the interview. Its worth watching if you missed it this morning.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/24063100
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: de-coupling, Emerging Markets, Infrastructure, Markets
Posted in Markets | No Comments »
Goldman Sachs: BRICs and Beyond
Thursday, March 27th, 2008
Mar. 27, 2008 - In November 2008, Goldman Sachs’ Chief Global Strategist, Jim O’Neill, and associates, who coined the “BRICs” term, have followed up with a complete updated report on the fundamentals for each of Brazil, Russia, India and China. The report goes on to cover the markets of the Next 11 frontier markets. Click the following link to download the complete report, BRICs and Beyond (Goldman Sachs).
Here are some excerpts:
India’s rising growth potential
…We argue that there has been a structural increase in India’s potential growth rate since 2003 on the back of high productivity growth. In this paper, we explain why productivity (by which we mean total factor productivity, or the manner in which all inputs are combined to achieve more output) has surged, and why we think this is likely to continue over the next decade.
… Industry is increasingly becoming an important growth driver, contrary to conventional wisdom that growth in India is only services-led. A quarter of services are directly linked to industry, in sectors such as trade, transport, electricity and construction.
…In India, labour is nearly four times more productive in industry and six times more productive in services than in agriculture, where there is a surplus of labour. Economic theory tells us that as labour moves from low-productivity sectors (such as agriculture) to high-productivity sectors (such as industry or services), overall output must improve.
…In absolute terms India will remain a low-income country for several decades, with per capita incomes well below its BRIC peers. But if it can fulfil its growth potential, it can become a motor for the world economy and a key contributor to generating spending growth.
…India’s imminent urbanisation process has implications for demand for housing, urban infrastructure, location of retail and demand for consumer durables. We expect the coming onstream of major highways (especially the Golden Quadrilateral) to drive growth in the transportation sector, spur demand for vehicles, increase real estate values along the corridor and potentially boost construction of suburban homes as people escape congested cities. The SEZs hold out substantial investment opportunities in all spheres of activity.
Russia: A smooth political transition
…There are signs that investment has begun to accelerate over the last 12 months, with capital expenditures up over 21%yoy in 2007H1. Private investment growth may suffer a brief interruption due to the recent troubles in the local credit markets. But public investment may make up some of the shortfall: after repairing its balance sheet and accumulating a substantial ‘rainy-day’ fund, the government has announced ambitious plans to invest over $1-trillion over the next ten years in roads, rail, ports, pipelines and other infrastructure projects.
…The BRICs dream is not even a best case scenario in fact, Russia’s recent performance has been considerably better than projected in the original BRICs papers. But it does assume that the necessary conditions for long-run growth are in place, conditions that we have tried to capture in our Growth Environment Scores (GES). Russia scores well above the emerging market mean on education, government deficit and external debt; marginally above average on openness and life expectancy; lower but still above average on technology (phones, PCs and internet access per capita); and somewhat below average on inflation, which is now in the high single digits.
…Our equity strategists’ favourite themes are the consumer, telecoms and retail sectors, as well as steel and pipe companies, and other names poised to benefit from the state’s infrastructure spending. They also see opportunities in domestic restructuring stories, such as power generation and gas. With significant segments of the economy still private, we see considerable opportunities in direct investment.
China: Will China grow old before getting rich?
…China’s unrivalled economic growth over the past quarter-century has surpassed all records and created a new standard in the history of economic development. With an average annual real GDP growth rate of 9.6% from 1978 to 2004, China’s pace of growth is faster than that achieved by any East Asian economy during their fastest-growing periods.
China’s investment strength is sustainable
…One of the most widely-held misconceptions about China is that the economy contains an over-investment time-bomb, which will soon result in a sharp correction in both investment and GDP growth, resulting in rising non-performing loans (NPLs) and in deflation. The reasoning behind this theory is that fixed asset investment (FAI) is growing at above 20% year on year, while the investment-to-GDP ratio is already above 45% (higher than the levels reached by Asian economies before the 1997 crisis). Furthermore, this investment boom is financed by misallocated bank credits and generates few returns.
Although this is a popular view, we believe it is wrong for two reasons. First, the conclusion is based on macro data that is deeply flawed, leading to a substantial overstatement of the investment-to-GDP ratio. Second, a high investment-to-GDP ratio is consistent with China’s rapid growth. The fact that the return on capital is high and generally has been climbing over the past decade supports our thesis that Chinas investment strength is sustainable.
The “B” in BRICs: Unlocking Brazil’s growth potential
We remain confident about Brazil’s growth potential, at least in terms of what we have envisaged in our BRICs studies. The main reason for Brazil’s underperformance is that, until now, the government had been in the process of implementing a stabilisation programme, with a view to achieving macroeconomic stability. This is a key precondition for growth. Thanks to these adjustment efforts, macroeconomic conditions are more favourable now than they have been for decades. The large balance of payments surpluses have been used to prepay external debt and accumulate reserves, while a credible central bank (BACEN) has reduced inflation to 3.0% in 2006.
We believe that the Lula II administration will sustain sound macroeconomic policies and make some progress on structural reforms. Stability should allow real GDP growth rates to move gradually towards Brazil’s potential rate of about 3.5%, which is near our BRICs potential growth rate of 3.7%.
We also believe that Brazil could grow much faster, perhaps at a secular growth rate of about 5.0%. For this to happen, the government will have to tackle four difficult structural problems:
· Brazil saves and invests too little. To address this issue, the government will have to deepen and improve the quality of the fiscal adjustment.
· The economy should be opened to trade.
· The government must improve the overall quality of education.
· The government should implement structural reforms to improve institutions, with a view to increasing total factor productivity.
We do not believe that the Lula II administration and Congress will be ambitious enough to implement this politically difficult agenda. Therefore, while Brazil has the potential to grow at or above 5.0%, this is unlikely to happen during the next four years.
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: BRICs, China, Emerging Markets, India, Markets, Russia
Posted in Markets | No Comments »
The World in 2050
Wednesday, March 26th, 2008
Courtesy: PriceWaterhouseCoopers
March 25 /CNW/ - Long-term growth prospects for China, India and other so-called ‘E7′ economies (Brazil, Mexico, Russia, Indonesia and Turkey) remain upbeat. However according to a new report from PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) an additional 13 emerging economies also have the potential to grow significantly faster than the established OECD countries. This rapid growth creates both challenges and opportunities for Canada.
The report, The World in 2050: Beyond the BRICs: a broader look at emerging market growth prospects, suggests that China could overtake the US by 2025 to become the world’s largest economy and will continue to grow to 130% of the size of the US economy by 2050. The Indian economy could grow to almost 90% of the size of the US economy by 2050. Brazil seems likely to overtake Japan by 2050 to move into fourth place, while Russia, Mexico and Indonesia all have the growth potential to surpass the economies of Germany or the UK by the middle of this century. The most impressive economic growth could be realized by Vietnam, with a potential growth rate of almost 10% per annum in real dollar terms. This rapid growth could propel the Vietnamese economy to around 70% of the size of the UK economy by 2050.
Interestingly, Nigeria has the long-term potential to overtake South Africa as the largest African economy by 2050. This assumes that non-oil based growth policies implemented in recent years are sustained in the long-run, something that may prove to be a challenge.
“As the economies of emerging nations grow, Canada’s share of the global economy is projected to diminish,” says Edward Mansfield, an associate partner with PwC’s statistics and economics group. “To maintain our competitive position, Canadian businesses will have to differentiate through innovation and technological progress. This will require greater investments in education and capital equipment to promote the productivity gains necessary for economic growth. However, as a highly culturally diverse nation, Canada could be well positioned to capitalize on the growth of emerging markets due to well established cultural and economic links.”
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: Brazil, BRICs, China, de-coupling, Emerging Markets, India, Markets, Metals, Russia
Posted in Markets | No Comments »
George Soros: The Worst Market Crisis in 60 Years
Friday, February 22nd, 2008
February 22, 2008 - George Soros, the infamous hedge fund manager who broke the British Pound, penned an article for FT.com, in which he posits that this crisis, unlike many of its peers, which occur every 4-10 years, is actually the end of a 60 year period of credit expansion led by the once dominant greenback. Here are a few excerpts from The Worst Market Crisis in 60 Years, by George Soros:
…the current crisis marks the end of an era of credit expansion based on the dollar as the international reserve currency. The periodic crises were part of a larger boom-bust process. The current crisis is the culmination of a super-boom that has lasted for more than 60 years.
…Everything that could go wrong did. What started with subprime mortgages spread to all collateralised debt obligations, endangered municipal and mortgage insurance and reinsurance companies and threatened to unravel the multi-trillion-dollar credit default swap market. Investment banks’ commitments to leveraged buyouts became liabilities. Market-neutral hedge funds turned out not to be market-neutral and had to be unwound. The asset-backed commercial paper market came to a standstill and the special investment vehicles set up by banks to get mortgages off their balance sheets could no longer get outside financing. The final blow came when interbank lending, which is at the heart of the financial system, was disrupted because banks had to husband their resources and could not trust their counterparties. The central banks had to inject an unprecedented amount of money and extend credit on an unprecedented range of securities to a broader range of institutions than ever before. That made the crisis more severe than any since the second world war.
Credit expansion must now be followed by a period of contraction, because some of the new credit instruments and practices are unsound and unsustainable. The ability of the financial authorities to stimulate the economy is constrained by the unwillingness of the rest of the world to accumulate additional dollar reserves. Until recently, investors were hoping that the US Federal Reserve would do whatever it takes to avoid a recession, because that is what it did on previous occasions. Now they will have to realise that the Fed may no longer be in a position to do so. With oil, food and other commodities firm, and the renminbi appreciating somewhat faster, the Fed also has to worry about inflation. If federal funds were lowered beyond a certain point, the dollar would come under renewed pressure and long-term bonds would actually go up in yield. Where that point is, is impossible to determine. When it is reached, the ability of the Fed to stimulate the economy comes to an end.
And finally,
Although a recession in the developed world is now more or less inevitable, China, India and some of the oil-producing countries are in a very strong countertrend. So, the current financial crisis is less likely to cause a global recession than a radical realignment of the global economy, with a relative decline of the US and the rise of China and other countries in the developing world.
Soros concludes that there is a danger that US protectionism could disrupt the global economy and plunge the world into a recession or worse.
Source: The Worst Market Crisis in 60 Years, George Soros, FT.com
People who read this post also read these:
Tags: BRICs, China, Credit Market, Economy, Emerging Markets, India, Investment Wisdom, Markets
Posted in Markets | 1 Comment »
Eastern Promises - Opportunity in Agricultural Commodities
Saturday, February 16th, 2008
Feb. 15, 2008 - Joe Friesen and Marcus Gee of the Globe and Mail published an excellent article Eastern Promises on how demand for all things agricultural commodities are being driven by growth from Emerging Markets. The piece features commentary by Don Coxe, Chief Investment Strategist, BMO Capital Markets, on food and the agricultural boom. This piece features lots of anecdotal and empirical information.
Here are some excerpts:
India’s consumption of pulses — yellow peas, lentils, chick peas, green peas — has doubled in a year. In a country where millions are strict vegetarians, pulses are an essential protein source that go into the preparation of dal, which is cooked every day in millions of homes. India’s struggling, still backward farm industry can’t keep up with the demand.
“It’s not our part of the world that changed things, it’s the millions of people over there that are no longer content to get along with a bowl of rice and a few loaves of bread. They’re adding meat and dairy to their diet and we aren’t producing enough feed grains, enough vegetable proteins, to supply their need,” said Donald Coxe, global portfolio strategist for Bank of Montreal.
“Milk is the new oil. Milk demand worldwide is rising faster than oil demand. That’s because of the new Asian middle cla
