Donald Coxe, Chief Investment Strategist, BMO Capital Markets has just released his latest instalment of Basic Points, “Capitalism Faces its Greatest Challenge” for November, 2008.
Mr. Coxe is best known for his highly read monthly newsletter, “Basic Points,” as well as his bi-weekly conference calls. His convictions that we are in the midst of the biggest long-term commodities bull market have been severely tested during the most recent months since this past summer, when he launched the Coxe Commodity Strategy Fund, but he remains convinced that the thematic fundamentals are in tact.
Here, we summarize his November 14, 2008 recommendations:
Its too late to sell losing stocks, and too soon to do more than nibble at bargains. This is a time for investors to be opportunistic about investing, and stocks are available at prices that will look incredibly cheap in a couple years’ time.
When conditions resume for rebuilding equity positions, buy banks and diversified financial sector stocks.In a global recovery, these should perform well, considering the mostly new management teams.
Buy commodity oriented stocks. They have been totally oversold beyond all expectations. When there is a global recovery, they will be the winning asset group.
During the waiting period, start accumulating convertible bonds of quality corporations. A sharp contraction in the near-record yield spread between investment grade companies’ bonds and comparable treasuries, could trigger a major equity rally.
Buy Emerging Market bonds from China, India, and Brazil, whose economies are fundamentally sound. Avoid Eastern European bonds.
Business-oriented tech-stocks should also be included when once again accumulating stocks as these will participate in the global recovery. comparatively, consumer-oriented tech stocks may take quite a while.
Railroad stocks benefit from lower energy costs and the savings may offset the reduction in top-line revenues during the recession. Upon exiting the recession, these should be core investments.
Gold has been disappointing. Though it has outperformed stocks since the peak in the S&P 500, this has not yet been reason enough to own it. As deflation fears diminish, it will once again regain its lustre.
Alex Patelis, Head of Global Economics, Merrill Lynch discusses the strength of BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) countries in the midst of the global credit crisis, and how well suited they are to recover strongly.
Patelis points out that close to 90% of global GDP growth will come from emerging markets economies in 2009, and goes one step further saying that he would not be surprised if global growth would come exclusively from emerging markets. They are underlevered, strong domestic economies, where consumption growth is being fuelled by income growth, and strong savings rates. In particular, he favours China and India.
September 17, 2008 - The fall in the price of oil during the past two months may not have surprised everyone, but its dramatic nature and swiftness was unexpected. One analyst who got it right was Rob Fraim of Mid-Atlantic Securities. With crude down by almost 40%, a new report on energy has just been published by Rob.
This report is worth perusing for two reasons: (1) Rob has a good long-term track record in this sphere, and (2) a common-sense approach and findings with which I mostly concur. Here are some excerpts from his current report.
Today I will tackle one of the (many) issues with which market participants are grappling. And I will have a sector recommendation that has “hero or a goat” implications for the writer of this missive.
I am cogitating on the disruptions and disasters in the financial sector – and the implications for the broad market. At some point you will hear from me on that subject as this mess unfolds and I feel that I have actionable thoughts to share.
Today though – we talk energy.
I’ll probably get tons of e-mail taking exception to my conclusions and citing multitudinous arcane bits of Economist World data. And I will gladly receive these and will appreciate the input. But that doesn’t have to mean that I will necessarily agree or find reason to change my conclusions.
I am approaching this … and I don’t want to use the word “gut feeling” – given that I believe that I have sound reasons for my opinion on this – but there is a certain amount of “feeling” involved in the process and conclusions. What I see in market action, what I hear from clients, what I sense in the mood of market participants, what I observe in the market’s reaction to events. And with all due respect to economists, the market is often more art than science. So I don my proverbial beret, pick up my figurative brushes and paint, and present my art project. Some fact, some feel, lots of opinion.
What a bleak mood in the energy patch. What a sickening slide. What the h*** happened? What an … opportunity?
Back on June 10, in a piece I wrote entitled “Oil – Whither Goest Thou? ”I gave the opinion that crude oil – then at $136 a barrel was overextended and due for a correction. I said that the $100 or so area looked about right. Of course oil promptly rallied to $147 or whatever it was and I was a stoopie-head for a little while. But since then, well … hey, hey what a genius, huh?
You don’t believe that I actually got something right? OK, you force me to quote/copy/paste. Here is an excerpt from the June 10 flash in which I recommended lightening up on energy stocks:
“Do I think that oil is going to $50? Not a chance? Not $50, not $60, not $80. But I do think that there is a better than average chance that we are going to revisit $100-ish and stabilize there for a while.
“This being the case I am suggesting that reaping some profits and reducing energy positions a bit might be a wise move – at least on a trading basis. Keep a core holding for the long-term, but lighten up. Sell some stuff. Write some covered calls. Hedge a bit. Maintain the core but trade with part of your energy investments. Do something other than get whipsawed.
“… It would not surprise me to see $100-105 oil by the end of the year. That probably equates to gasoline in the $3.50-ish area.”
Of course after that I went on to elaborate brilliantly (oh all right it wasn’t that brilliant, but I did elaborate) on the reasons why I was – at that time, in June – becoming cautious on energy. Recapping (sans the details) the reasons for the selling recommendation were:
a) Demand destruction resulting from changing consumer and transportation industry driving habits and vehicle choices
b) The potential for a rise in the US dollar
c) Slowing demand for China with the Olympics build-out winding down
d) Modest production growth – specifically from Russia
e) Comments from the Saudis saying that there was no justification for the rise in oil prices that had occurred.
Hmm … not too shabby on those points if I do say so myself.
And then I stated the following:
“When the crowd is virtually all leaning in one direction on a sector, you have to take advantage of it at some point. You just have to. Right now everybody says that financials are garbage and energy is gold, and we of course know all of the reasons for both. But just you wait and see… 12 months, 18 months out – when quality banks have risen 30% in price – the analysts will fall in love with them again. And if energy stocks go down 20% the cries to sell will erupt. We have to take the opposite side of the masses sometimes. We. Just. Have. To.”
So as it turns out I was reasonably on target with those comments and the call to reduce energy holdings for a while. (You know what they say about even a blind squirrel finding an acorn every now and then.) Now the burning question on the minds of my readers is this: “What now, Rob?” Well, again, I don’t know how many minds are burning and hearts yearning to hear the answer, but I’ll take a crack anyway.
I don’t expect a huge rally in oil in the near term, but I do believe the correction has just about run its course. Recently when crude approached $100 on the way down, OPEC began the “defending” process by announcing some production cutbacks – hoping to maintain $100 as floor of sorts. But now with the disruptions across all segments of the market, oil prices have moved right through that level – particularly yesterday as panic hit all markets, trading below $92 as I write this. I would not be surprised to see OPEC coming back with more production curtailments.
I am somewhat more bullish on natural gas prices than many analysts I have read, more based on seasonality, but also because of increased focus on natural gas use. (We’ve all seen the Boone Pickens/Aubrey McClendon ads. And we are approaching an election – what politician is going to badmouth natural gas? Heck, Nancy Pelosi said that it isn’t even a fossil fuel. As to the seasonality play, I have had some success through the years in buying natural gas stocks in the fall prior to our entering the heating season for a trade out as spring approaches.
So, I’m kind of reasonably positive on oil itself – the commodity – for the short term. I’m growing more bullish on natural gas – against the opinion of some smart people who feel otherwise.
The key point though is that I am getting significantly more interested in the stocks of the energy companies. Why? Because it doesn’t take $140 oil for the energy companies to make a lot of money. They do very nicely at $100 and the resultant decline in gasoline prices (once we get past this hurricane pricing anomaly) will calm down some of the finger-pointing and windfall profit-espousing by the politicians.
And the prices of the energy company stocks – oil and gas producers, drillers, coal companies, energy trusts, MLPs, alternative energy … the whole bunch of them – have just absolutely plummeted over the last couple of months and it (again I hate to use the word but here I go) feels like a bit of a selling crescendo taking place.
I have made the comment to a number of people the last few days that it seems that we have margin clerks running billion dollar portfolios. We know there was a liquidation of a large energy-focused hedge fund recently. The sector action of late feels/smells/acts like there is more forced selling taking place. And as one astute observer pointed out to me, in addition to the margin clerks, you have to factor in the risk management people at the funds. Forced selling of another sort. On top of that there seem to have been some significant fund redemption requests at hedge funds – particularly by fund-of-fund groups, which are notoriously fickle and prone to pull out.
So now that everything energy-related has been hammered we hear all of the after-the-fact cautionary/bearish thoughts: China doesn’t want any energy anymore … all commodities are going to fall another 50% they say … the economy is going to totally destroy energy demand … we’re all going to bike to work and cook on campfires … we’re going to be awash in cheap oil … blah, blah, yadda, yadda.
We’ve heard it all lately. I’m just not totally buying it. I’m not convinced that the big picture has shifted totally.
I believe that the stocks of energy companies have more than discounted the decline we have seen and then some. 50% declines in stock prices have not been out of the ordinary. I don’t think you have to be a raging, snorting bull on the commodities themselves to believe that the producers of energy products and services will be very nicely profitable – even at today’s lower-than-before prices for oil and gas.
And my very astute friend Jeffrey Saut at Raymond James (who has been spot on about energy and who has become more bullish of late) pointed out something very interesting yesterday. Evidently China – the previous “buyer at the margin,” the force that kept sopping up all supply for so long, which contributed to the big rise in energy before – has been pretty much out of the energy markets for a couple of months. The reason: pollution concerns during the Olympics and the Paralympics (the games for those with disabilities.) Many factories and industries were shut down and idled during that period so as to improve air quality during a time of so many visitors and so much world attention being focused on China. (We know China is image-conscious. Just ask the little girl who was not considered pretty enough to sign the anthem live and was replaced by a more attractive lip-syncher.)
The Paralympics end on September 17, and this means that China may very soon reopen manufacturing and transport – particularly so since there is a massive earthquake rebuilding to be done. And they could well be back in the energy market as buyers almost immediately – like on the 18th. The implications for the energy commodities are positive and a psychology shift in those markets could quickly spill over to the beaten up stocks of the energy companies.
Big picture, let’s not forget a few key energy points:
1. Production in many places is peaking or has peaked. Mexico appears to have peaked and Russia – a recent source of supply and the currently the 2nd largest oil producer – is doing things in a way that is short-term profitable for them, but long-term counterproductive. They are investing very, very little in new exploration (the capital intensive part of the business) – opting instead to try to squeeze out production from existing fields. That’s cheaper production for them in the short run, output has peaked and they are depleting those fields. Ultimately, they stand to be left with played out reserves and few new prospects – since they are skimping horribly on cap-ex and exploration now. It’s like the landlord who spends all the rent and doesn’t maintain the building. Eventually it catches up to him as the structure falls apart. Or the pharmaceutical company that does no R&D even though patents are expiring. Russia is milking the cow but not feeding it.
2. The low-lying fruit in the oil business has been picked. The potential “super giants” being explored and developed now – Brazil’s Carioca/Sugarloaf and the Bakken formation in the US for example, while exciting are also challenging and very expensive to produce on a per barrel basis. Same with the huge Canadian tar sands projects. Tar sand fields have been known of for years, but until oil reached high prices it was economically impractical to extract oil there.
There is still plenty of oil out there, but it is not the cheaply available, “poke a stick in the ground and watch it flow” type of oil. Prices will have to remain high to justify development.
3. While the world got a bit “China and India crazy” there for a while as regards energy consumption, the basic premise remains valid. As these huge populations become more urban and industrialized in nature – with cars, the need for electricity, etc. – there will be growing demand for the foreseeable future. Oh there will be the month-to-month ups and downs of course and everybody will obsess about that. But big picture – demand grows.
4. Alternative energy sources – and look, I’m a big believer that we have to develop new ways to provide power – are a long way from meeting our energy needs. And while they may do so one day, for now those needs must be met from both traditional (fossil) and progressive (alternative) sources. I believe that we need to break the oil addiction via new sources. But that is a process over a generation of time, not an immediate reality. For now, to quote Mr. Pickens, we have to drill, drill, drill.
5. We need more electrical power. Badly. Some experts say as many as 30 new power plants are needed ASAP. We might be oil addicted, but we are electricity junkies of the first magnitude. Computers, multiple TV sets, cell phones, iPods, recessed lighting all over the house, floodlights in the yard, plug-in cars on the way, so many appliances and gadgets in every home that it would have seemed like The Jetsons to a 1960s observer. And what runs power plants? While it might be alternative sources as time goes on, right now and for a good while to come, it’s fuel of the old-style. Natural gas and coal mostly.
6. And speaking of natural gas, I like Pickens’ idea of automobile conversion. We have lots of natural gas produced domestically and it is comparatively clean and certainly readily available. And what does that mean for the future price of natural gas? The same natural gas that runs the power plants being used to run our cars? Not too hard to figure out.
7. If this financial system mess puts pressure on the US dollar that has the obvious effect of causing oil prices to rise, all other things being equal, as it will take more dollars to exchange for one barrel.
By the way, I recently talked to a coal industry contact – a coal broker – who said that although the stock market doesn’t indicate it, the coal business is not bad at all. Pricing is off of the peaks, but still pretty strong and holding. He said that a lot of buyers – utilities in particular – have been playing a waiting game, looking for lower prices. But with winter approaching they don’t have much time left to get their supplies locked in. Some of the buyers have tried to play hardball with him – saying that they would just buy cheaper from someone else. But there isn’t much of “someone else” out their. Demand season is coming up and there’s not a lot of excess.
Additionally, people forget that most coal is sold under long-term contracts, not in the spot market. So the stock market got spooked about falling oil and gas prices and extrapolated that to coal – when in fact these short-term energy market gyrations have less impact on earnings than they do in other energy areas. Heck, lower fuel prices actually kind of help the coal companies in one regard since they are big fuel users for their equipment.
Coal got nutty a few months back and stock prices were way overdone to the upside as hot money chased the relatively small market cap of the whole sector. But after 50% to 60% declines across the board for the coal stocks over the last little bit? Getting very interesting I think.
Oil, coal, natural gas, alternative energy sources, E&P companies, drillers and service companies, energy trusts, MLPs…all have their own particular appeal in a portfolio. I cannot discuss specific companies here, but if you would like to know which stocks I like in which areas, drop me a note or give me a call.
I thought about finishing up this little blurb and sending it out earlier today, but it has been busy – for obvious reasons with the whole Lehman/Bank of America/Merrill Lynch/AIG/Washington Mutual/etc. etc. mess today. And as it turns out it was just as well, since the energy sector (using oil as a proxy) and the market in general have clearly been weak. Some will attribute the $4 drop in crude today to economic weakness and upcoming lower demand. I tend to believe that it is more a function of forced selling, an aversion to risk in the markets, and the old “sell what you can not what you want to” phenomenon. I don’t know exactly where oil bottoms, nor would I be likely to be correct in pronouncing an exact moment for the general market decline.
But I am intrigued enough by energy sector valuations and energy sector prospects to recommend “re-loading” positions starting right now.
As always, I hope that I’m right in the first minutes and days after such a call. But I probably won’t be. However for the weeks and months ahead … I have a good level of confidence in the ultimate success of the idea.
Equity markets across the world have been reeling lately, and our trading range charts for indices of 22 countries highlight the carnage. Countries to recently take big hits include Brazil, Canada, South Africa, and of course, Russia. Any time the price moves below the green shading, it is trading more than 2 standard deviations below its 50-day moving average. Below the green shading is considered extreme oversold territory, and prices don’t typically stay that oversold for extended periods of time.
The one positive chart might be India’s Sensex index that has moved back above its 50-day moving average recently and formed a short-term uptrend.
This past year’s declines in local and international markets have had their beginnings at different points in time. This chart below, produced by the fine folks at Bespoke, pays no attention to their timing. Its not a pretty picture, but the perspective sure is useful. Often, we are subjected to guided reporting, where issuers or promoters use numbers and moving averages that “soften” the real numbers.
Canada comes out on top!
Here below is what most investors really want to know; How did they perform from peak until now, irrespective of timing?
After declining 4.25% on Wednesday, 3.94% yesterday, and 3.75% today, Russia’s RTS index is now 41.19% below its 52-week high. These declines put it second to last behind China when looking at recent equity market returns for 22 major countries. As shown, China has fallen 64% from its 52-week high last October! The declines recently in global equity markets have really been astounding. Japan, Spain, Brazil, India, Italy, South Korea, Singapore, Sweden, Taiwan, and Hong Kong all join China and Russia with equity markets off at least 30% from their 52-week highs. North American countries rank 1,2,3 as far as countries holding up the best. International exposure has never hurt so bad.
August 25, 2008 - Courtesy: Bespoke Investment Group - The MSCI World index, which measures global equity market performance, is now up just 68% (not total return) since its bottom on March 12, 2003. After analyzing the performance of various country indices since then, we found some interesting results.
Since the 3/12/03 global market bottom, Brazil, India and Mexico all have total returns of more than 400%, with Brazil leading the way at 427%. Germany has been the best performing Western European country with a total return of 187%. At the bottom of the barrel is Japan, with a gain of 68%, but unfortunately the US ranks second to last at 77%. So while much has been made of how well the US has held up during this downturn, it still lags behind pretty much everyone else when looking at the last bull and the current bear. The most surprising performance number comes from China. After its bubble and bust from 2005 to present, China’s performance is pretty much right inline with the US at 79%. With so much focus on China’s growth this decade, one would think its equity markets would be at the top of the performance ladder with other BRIC countries.
Here are Bespoke’s unbeatable trading range charts for 22 key equity markets around the world. The light blue shading represents one standard deviation above and below each index’s 50-day moving average. The green shading represents between one and two standard deviations below the 50-day, and vice versa for the red shading. Most countries continue to trade into oversold territory, but some have been getting hit extra hard while others have rallied off of their lows. Some countries that failed to bounce off the July lows include Brazil, China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Mexico, Russia and South Africa. On the other hand, India, most of Europe, and the US have come off their lows and are testing their 50-day moving averages.
June 24, 2008 - Courtesy of Bespoke Investment Group - The recent selloff in equities has really spared no one. As shown in our trading range charts below of 22 major country indices, the trend has been down across the board in recent weeks. Even Brazil, Mexico and Russia, who had all held up relatively well this year, have sold off quite a bit. Currently, 19 of the 22 countries are trading in oversold territory (Canada, Japan and Russia are neutral). European countries like France, Germany and Italy have really taken it on the chin, while China and India remain the biggest losers in 2008. After forming short-term uptrends off of the March lows, global equity markets have now lost most of their gains and are looking to move back into downtrends.
March 25 /CNW/ - Long-term growth prospects for China, India and other so-called ‘E7′ economies (Brazil, Mexico, Russia, Indonesia and Turkey) remain upbeat. However according to a new report from PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) an additional 13 emerging economies also have the potential to grow significantly faster than the established OECD countries. This rapid growth creates both challenges and opportunities for Canada.
The report, The World in 2050: Beyond the BRICs: a broader look at emerging market growth prospects, suggests that China could overtake the US by 2025 to become the world’s largest economy and will continue to grow to 130% of the size of the US economy by 2050. The Indian economy could grow to almost 90% of the size of the US economy by 2050. Brazil seems likely to overtake Japan by 2050 to move into fourth place, while Russia, Mexico and Indonesia all have the growth potential to surpass the economies of Germany or the UK by the middle of this century. The most impressive economic growth could be realized by Vietnam, with a potential growth rate of almost 10% per annum in real dollar terms. This rapid growth could propel the Vietnamese economy to around 70% of the size of the UK economy by 2050.
Interestingly, Nigeria has the long-term potential to overtake South Africa as the largest African economy by 2050. This assumes that non-oil based growth policies implemented in recent years are sustained in the long-run, something that may prove to be a challenge.
“As the economies of emerging nations grow, Canada’s share of the global economy is projected to diminish,” says Edward Mansfield, an associate partner with PwC’s statistics and economics group. “To maintain our competitive position, Canadian businesses will have to differentiate through innovation and technological progress. This will require greater investments in education and capital equipment to promote the productivity gains necessary for economic growth. However, as a highly culturally diverse nation, Canada could be well positioned to capitalize on the growth of emerging markets due to well established cultural and economic links.”
Feb. 3, 2008 - The nature of the economic strength and stability of the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) countries is a less well known or understood fact among investors. There remains a wide gap between perceptions and reality.
Remember 1997 and 1998? Many investors, excited about the growth of Asian and emerging countries in the late nineties and invested their money found out about credit related risk first when the 1997 ‘Asian Contagion’ occurred and was followed upon by the Long Term Capital Management bailout which unfolded in 1998. These events destabilized global markets and investors were taken by surprise as markets melted down.
For this reason, its important to go back to that time and re-examine Malaysia and Thailand, as examples, of where investors were excited by the rapid economic growth, but ignored the then inherent high credit risk, much to their expense. A decade ago (yes, a decade ago) when all of this was happening, only 3% of the grand total of emerging markets sovereign debt was rated as investment grade by any of the ratings agencies.
In 1997, only 10 out of 120 companies that form the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, had ADRs.
Excited by the G7 debt-financed growth, investors made bets that were inherently risky to their preservation of capital, not simply volatile. Circa 1997, emerging markets were in debt to the industrialized world by about $100-billion in the current account deficit column, and dependent on the kindness of their G7 financiers.
When the Malay and Thai governments were unable to meet current account obligations, and started printing money in order to meet them, the Fed blew the whistle upon discovering that sufficient reserves were not available to support the currency valuations. Hence the overnight slashing of Asian currencies.
At best, the general sentiment surrounding emerging markets has remained sceptical, and for this reason, as fundamentally sound as the BRIC countries economies are today, the market has been adopting the BRIC investment story very gradually. This time though, it is credit worthiness that is being overlooked.
Source: Merrill Lynch October 2006
Source: Merrill Lynch, October 2006
Today, emerging markets sit atop a current account surplus in excess of $700-billion, and it is the industrialized G7 who are in debt, by the same amount. Longer term surpluses in excess of $3-trillion are to be found on the balance sheets of mostly the BRIC countries today in the form of Foreign Exchange surpluses, and trade surpluses. China alone now nurses a trade and forex surplus nearing US$1.5-tillion. Russia, has managed to build up reserves of US$450-billion as well as Putin’s US$150-billion ‘contigency’ fund, set aside so that it may sidestep any kind of financial shock. India has amassed a forex surplus of around US$275-billion. Brazil’s forex reserves now stand at US$178-billion.
BRIC countries have been financing the debt, and driving the growth of G7 countries for the last 5-7 years. China has emerged as the worlds manufacturing hub, while India has come on very strong as its counterpart hub in services, both providing Western firms access to inexpensive educated and -or- highly-skilled labour. Russia, under Putin, has successfully emerged as a highly profitable energy and raw materials producer, second in oil and gas reserves to Saudi Arabia. Brazil has changed the regional balance in the Americas by turning itself into the winds of east-west trade in hard and soft commodities and using its strength to bolster its new economic clout in relation to North America.
China’s growth is less dependent on the health of the US economy, as is commonly perceived. A recent Economist article points out that China’s true exports-to-GDP ratio is actually below 10%, that China has been quite successful to date at rebalancing its economy in favour of domestic growth as a driver. As for India, 87% of its GDP is consumed domestically, making it quite independent from the risk of the US threatened consumer hegemony. Russians are enjoying three times the disposable income of 7 years ago and driving consumption growth, as are Brazilians.
North American and European companies are looking to these consumers to drive demand and growth to their top and bottom lines.
In a word, things have changed.
They have changed in a very meaningful, very important way. The relationship that now exists between emerging markets and G7 countries is ‘symbiotic.’ and interdependent.
Source: Merrill Lynch, October 2006
Today, around 60-70% of emerging markets sovereign debt is investment grade rated and all 120 companies that form the key MSCI Emerging Markets Index have ADR listings.
In 1997-1998, the world’s biggest western banks took advantage of bailout conditions to take ownership of Asian banks, once protected by thousand-year-old protectionist laws. Today, powerful and wealthy Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) are bailing out the same banks, Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, and Morgan Stanley.
On Wall Street in the past few weeks, the sums have been bigger and the actions more benign—at least so far. This week Merrill Lynch and Citigroup became the latest to get the sovereign-wealth treatment, picking up a further $6.6 billion and $14.5 billion respectively, much of it from governments in Asia and the Middle East (see article). Sapped by the subprime crisis, rich-world financial-services groups have been administered nearly $69 billion-worth of infusions from the savings of the developing world in the past ten months, according to Morgan Stanley.
Commodities are not the only source of sovereign wealth. Many Asian emerging markets have been running current-account surpluses at the same time as they have been managing their exchange rates. As they have mopped up dollars, using government bonds, they have accumulated reserves. At first these went into safe, liquid assets like American Treasury bonds—the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98 was still a recent memory and many countries were keen to amass reserves. But economies like China, South Korea and Taiwan now have more reserves than they need to defend themselves against shocks. Their governments understandably want to earn a higher return than Treasury bonds will pay, so they create a fund to manage their assets. Source: The Economist, Jan. 17, 2008, Asset-Backed Insecurity
It has become such that neither Emerging Markets nor the G7 can allow each other to be destabilized, as evidenced by the large, noted, SWF investments, as they have each other’s economic ‘lives’ in the balance.
You might get the idea that emerging markets are correlated more to the US than they actually are, when you see that they have suffered like western stock markets, from a selloff. Their correlation is low, between .30 and .40, not zero or negative. There are those who would have us believe that the decoupling thesis is suffering from the same disease as the bull market. Those are probably the same folks, who last year began to re-write their theses from decoupling to recoupling to suit themselves this year, as the need to raise cash by selling the last two year’s profitable trades became an increasingly inevitable requirement, in order to shore up balance sheets.
Our expectation is that the credit squeeze ailing the market will come to a reversal point, at some point over the next 2-4 weeks as the banks round the corner on the cash call that has forced the wholesale liquidation of emerging markets and commodities related investing.
Emerging Markets are strong, and some of their [inflationary] growth pressures may get somewhat solved by a slowdown in the US, in the form of an imported soft landing. This is by no means advice, but if you subscribe to this thesis, then there is reason (for those of us on the buy-side) to believe that there will be a recovery in the decoupling thesis, and thus emerging markets equities throughout the second half of the year, from the current lows.
First, however, until the cash call is complete, and the future of the monoline insurers (MBIA, ABK) is resolved in the form of perhaps a bailout, we may continue to see more downside.
Now may prove to be a good time to nibble at emerging markets and commodities again and add or gain exposure as they are far more attractively priced. Here are a variety of ETFs and open ended funds (Canadian fund companies with offerings) that provide broad (diversified) and narrow exposure (country and regional funds) to BRIC and emerging markets.
Dividend Emerging Markets ETFs
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High-Yielding Fund (DEM)
Multi-Region (but not Total) Emerging Markets ETFs
BLDRS Emerging MKTS 50 ADR Index Fund (ADRE)
Claymore/BNY BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) ETF (EEB)
streetTRACKS SPDR S&P BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) 40 ETF (BIK)
iShares MSCI BRIC Index Fund (BKF)
Latin America Regional ETFs
iShares S&P Latin America 40 Index Fund (ILF)
SPDR S&P Emerging Latin America ETF (GML)
European Emerging Markets Regional ETFs
SPDR S&P Emerging Europe ETF (GUR)
Middle East and Africa Regional ETFs
SPDR S&P Emerging Middle East & Africa ETF (GAF)
India - Barclays iPath India ETN (INP)
On the Toronto Stock Exchange
Claymore BRIC ETF (CBQ.T) Open Ended Funds (Canadian)
Broad Mandate Emerging Markets
Tmpleton Emerging Markets
AGF Emerging Markets
Pro FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index
TD Emerging Markets
United-Emerging Markets Pool Cl A
CI Emerging Markets
United-Emerging Markets Pool Cl W
BMO Emerging Markets
Brandes Emerging Markets Equity
CIBC Emerging Markets Index
National Bank Emerging Markets
Region/Country Mandates
Excel India Fund
Excel China Fund
Excel Chindia Fund
Excel Emerging Europe Fund
Templeton BRIC Fund
Sovereign Wealth Fund Index: Sovereign wealth funds were hardly talked about twelve months ago. Now they are one of the hottest topics in global financial markets. Over the last year, these state-owned entities have spent over $75bn snapping up stakes in some of the world’s biggest banks, taken big positions in stock exchanges on both sides of the Atlantic and even attempted a takeover of one of Britain’s leading supermarkets.
Such funds have existed for decades, but the shift in global economic power and the current weakness in western markets has given SWFs – forecast to grow assets fivefold to $13.4tr by 2017 – new influence and raised new fears about their motives. Critics such as President Sarkozy of France and some US politicians worry that SWFs tend to be secretive, target political as well as financial returns, and operate at the whim of governments not always sympathetic to western economic and political interests…
Jan. 22, 2008 - Phew! Finally some sense prevailed at the Fed with an astonishing cut of 75 bps and 25 bps from Bank of Canada. What a turn of events. There hasn’t been a rate cut like this since the eighties.
Well, here we are in the midst of a global panic, and the media has been all over it, doing its best to carry the news of the panic. That’s why its really important to keep a clear head here, and cut through the clutter.
Emerging markets and commodities are still the strongest bets globally. Emerging markets have been operating from a higher quantum of growth roughly 2-3 times that of industrialized economies. In fact, emerging markets have been dealing with inflationary pressures. A recession in the west relieves some of that pressure, and that is good news. Fact is, the BRIC will still be in need of the raw materials, metals, oil and food, and that demand growth is expected to continue well into the next two decades. So why are they selling off?
The headlines say that demand from emerging markets for commodities will decline and that’s why they are getting hit hard. The real story is that they have been the best performing assets out there, and that is the easiest place to raise cash given the outstanding obligations of the credit market. Those responsible plain and simply need the cash, to refinance their obligations, and to shore up their balance sheets.
Who is doing all of the dumping of stocks? It is most certainly NOT you and me, or the average investor. We are just supposed to stand by and watch this happen.
Its a cabal of large institutional so-called ’smart money’, hedge funds, and currency traders that have driven this market to its present levels.
The credit market (subprime) meltdown, and the credit default swap meltdown, with the failures of MBIA, AMBAC, and ACA, that is following on its heels is the first part of this. The losses at the investment banks are precipitating the repatriation of capital in order to shore up balance sheets. The large proprietary traders are selling off their fundamentally strongest holdings with the biggest gains, in such things as commodities and emerging markets, to accomplish this. This amounts to a giant MARGIN CALL against these obligations. So, Canada and Emerging Markets are not selling off because there is something terribly wrong with them; it is because the biggest players need to get their hands on cash.
Cut through the clutter and you get to the unwinding of the carry trade. This most likely is the largest contributor to the ’round the world’ sell-off.
The slide of the dollar as a result of out-of-sync interest rate cuts, the late start in cutting rates by the Fed to get around the subprime and CDO meltdown, followed on by the ECB and BoJ’s reluctance to cut rates or print money is now leading to a wholesale unwinding of yen/dollar carry trade. And it is BIG. This, in our humble opinion, is the real source of indiscriminate selling of equities which explains why we have seen the kind of volatility we are seeing in the BRIC, emerging markets, and Australia and Canada.
…The dollar hit a 2-1/2-year low of 105.61 yen on electronic trading platform EBS early on Tuesday, but later pared its losses and stood at 106.16 yen as of 0322 GMT…
The euro fell to a five-month low of 152.32 yen on EBS, while sterling fell as low as 204.87 yen the lowest since April 2006. They later rebounded off those lows.
“…It’s a combination of carry unwind and repatriation, as well as little or no chance of rate hikes being priced into the high-yielders,” says Gerrard Katz, head of North Asia FX trading at Standard Chartered.
“…Yen carry unwinding might, say, account for about 5 out of 10 of the entire move, with short-term speculators accounting for the other 5 or a bit more,” said a vice president for foreign exchange sales at a European bank…
“…What we are seeing now is investors pulling out of their profitable trades because of risk aversion,’’ said Bilal Hafeez, London-based global head of currency strategy at Deutsche Bank AG, the world’s biggest currency trader. “You see the euro coming off, a decline in emerging-market assets and a rally in the yen.
They are typical signs of carry trades being unwound…’’
“…Investors are likely to continue to liquidate their carry trades in coming weeks, said Neil Jones, head of European hedge fund sales at Mizuho Capital Markets in London. Jones predicts that a weekly close below 154 yen (vs. Euro) will “trigger a wave of sell signals’’ for the euro. He said the yen could rise to 100 per dollar by the end of March…”
To wit, in advance of the unwinding, you can bet that some of these ’sophisticated’ investors who borrowed in yen to invest in higher yielding opportunities elsewhere, covered their own backsides with short positions which they will undoubtedly cover once they are through unwinding their yen carry trade bets that are taking the market down. Hold on to your seats for now…and bet on a bounce at the other end.
This may prove to be the contrarian opportunity of the year to get some (more) exposure of those hard hit commodities and emerging markets. As per Dennis Gartman and Doug Kass, lets be careful out there.
