Once again, we continue to be impressed by the charting and tabling work that Bespoke Investment Group compiles on a daily basis. Here below is the latest survey which compiles the largest market capitalizations of companies from around the world.
One notable standout is the size difference between Exxon Mobil ($438-billion) and Gazprom ($237-billion). We point this out simply because while Exxon is worth close to twice as much in market cap, Gazprom happens to be 6 times larger according to their total hydrocarbon reserves, and a reserve life index of roughly 28 years or so, vs. Exxon’s 17-18 years. This is the post Georgia debacle, post-oil-price-downturn price. Russian energy companies are cheap, cheap, cheap.
And, even after the huge haircut that PetroChina and China’s largest banks and companies have gotten the last year, PetroChina still commands 2nd place at $341-billion, China Mobile at 5th place, ICBC at 7th place, and CCB in the 15th spot.
Finally, where is India? We give 3-5 years before several Indian outfits make it to the market cap pantheon. That spells opportunity.
Below we highlight the 30 largest companies in the World by market cap ($). As shown, Exxon Mobil is the top dog by about $70 billion. Exxon is trailed by another energy company, Petrochina, then General Electric and Microsoft. Eleven of the top 30 are based in the United States. The Energy sector has the largest representation at 8, followed by Technology at 5. Only 3 companies in the top 30 are up in 2008 — Wal-Mart, IBM and Johnson&Johnson. And Apple and Google followers will be happy to see them ranked 25th and 26th in the World.
There is little evidence to suggest that Chinese manufacturing competitiveness has deteriorated meaningfully.
The mainstream media has been filled with reports about Chinese companies closing production facilities due to rising costs. Some analysts have concluded that China is quickly losing its competitive edge, and international producers are moving to other countries. In reality, there has been no meaningful decline of China’s export market share, particularly when exports of oil-producing countries are excluded. Indeed, China’s slowing export growth in recent months is a reflection of changing global market conditions rather than a deterioration in Chinese producers’ competitiveness. Rising input costs due to higher commodities prices are not unique to China: manufacturers around the world are suffering similar cost pressures and margin squeezes. In addition, the RMB’s appreciation has not been excessive, rising at a 3.5% annual rate in trade-weighted terms since its 2005 de-peg from the U.S. dollar. The trade-weighted yuan is still below its 2002 levels, when the economy was struggling with a deflationary shock. Finally, recent weakness in the export sector can be partially attributed to the Chinese government’s voluntary export restraints, which have been part of the country’s broader growth-rebalancing strategy. These policies could be removed any time if excessive weakness develops. Already, the government has increased VAT rebates for textile and garment exporters since the beginning of the month.
June 24, 2008 - Courtesy of Bespoke Investment Group - The recent selloff in equities has really spared no one. As shown in our trading range charts below of 22 major country indices, the trend has been down across the board in recent weeks. Even Brazil, Mexico and Russia, who had all held up relatively well this year, have sold off quite a bit. Currently, 19 of the 22 countries are trading in oversold territory (Canada, Japan and Russia are neutral). European countries like France, Germany and Italy have really taken it on the chin, while China and India remain the biggest losers in 2008. After forming short-term uptrends off of the March lows, global equity markets have now lost most of their gains and are looking to move back into downtrends.
May 26, 2008 - Pimco’s Bill Gross makes a most humorous analyses, drawing parallels that the hordes are marching on the new Rome (America), and that its time to act. Make sure you read this must read, the June 2008 Investment Outlook, by Bill Gross. At the end, Gross puts forth his recommendations.
What this country needs is either a good 5 cent cigar or the reincarnation of an Illinois “rail-splitter” willing to tell the American people “what up” -”what really up.” We have for so long now been willing to be entertained rather than informed, that we more or less accept majority opinion, perpetually shaped by ratings obsessed media, at face value. After 12 months of an endless primary campaign barrage, for instance, most of us believe that a candidate’s preacher - Democrat or Republican - should be a significant factor in how we vote. We care more about who’s going to be eliminated from this week’s American Idol than the deteriorating quality of our healthcare system. Alternative energy discussion takes a bleacher’s seat to the latest foibles of Lindsay Lohan or Britney Spears and then we wonder why gas is four bucks a gallon. We care as much as we always have - we just care about the wrong things: entertainment, as opposed to informed choices; trivia vs. hardcore ideological debate.)
It’s Sunday afternoon at the Coliseum folks, and all good fun, but the hordes are crossing the Alps and headed for modern day Rome - better educated, harder working, and willing to sacrifice today for a better tomorrow. Can it be any wonder that an estimated 1% of America’s wealth migrates into foreign hands hands every year? We, as a people, are overweight, poorly educated, overindulged, and imbued with such a sense or self importance on a geopolitical scale, that our allies are dropping like flies. “Yes we can?” Well, if so, then the “we” is the critical element, not the leader that will be chosen in November. Let’s get off the couch and shape up-physically, intellectually, and institutionally-and begin to make some informed choices about our future. Lincoln didn’t say it, but might have agreed, that the worst part about being fooled is fooling yourself, and as a nation, we’ve been doing a pretty good job of that for a long time now.
May 12, 2008 - Jerome Booth, Head of Research at Ashmore Investment Management, UK, has written an insightful article for FT.com, Insight: A Global Rebalancing Act, May 12, 2008. Here are a few excerpts:
Gross national savings are over 30 per cent of GDP on average in emerging countries, and for a decade private and official savers in these countries have been investing overseas – in the US and Europe – under the impression that these were safer markets than at home. Yet the dollar is far from the safest currency and not the store of value it was. US Treasuries are not zero risk – the implicit myth in the term “the risk-free rate”. Treasuries have currency, curve and volatility risks. Investors in triple A structured credit got a shock when they realised their investment was risky.
Likewise emerging market savers are getting a shock about Treasuries and other US and European assets. The money is returning home, and the move is structural, not cyclical. The global imbalance of a negative US personal savings rate on the one hand being financed by high emerging savings on the other is starting to reverse.
With this reversal, or rebalancing, is coming, we believe, a currency realignment and a series of investment booms across emerging economies as investment focus shifts. Rather than using “decoupling” in describing the impact of the credit crunch on emerging markets, we should use “negative correlation”.
The policy asymmetry between the US and emerging markets is that the emerging markets, with undervalued currencies, have an additional degree of freedom. They have the choice to mess up (do nothing) or control inflation (let the currency rise, raise interest rates). In our view, emerging market central banks will largely pass this test and do the sensible thing, though this is not what the market appears to have priced in yet.
As recently as ten years ago, emerging markets still held their hands out for development loans and foreign aid. Today, their fiscal prudence and wealth has put them in the position of bailing out the western banking system.
Why are investors taking so long to realize this critical distinction and its meaning?
April 30, 2008 - CIBC World Markets Chief Strategist, Jeff Rubin, says that Oil will eventually reach $150/barrel in 2010 and over $200/barrel by 2012. He cites among the leading reasons, the advent of cheap cars from India and China, or rather Tatas and Cherys, that will enable millions of middle class Asians who couldn’t previously afford a car, to do so, Take these developments and place them agaisnt the backdrop of peak oil and a decline in oil exports from key suppliers, Saudi Arabia, Russia and Kuwait, and we are in the midst of a long term supply/demand imbalance. Here are couple of excerpts:
Whether we are already at the peak in world oil production remains to be seen, but it is increasingly clear that the outlook for oil supply signals a period of unprecedented scarcity.
Our latest review of probable supply suggests oil production will hardly grow at all, with average daily production between now and 2012 rising by barely more than a million barrels per day (see pages 4-7). Despite the recent record jump in oil prices, the outlook suggests that oil prices will continue to rise steadily over the next five years, almost doubling from current levels.
While global oil supply is not growing, global gasoline demand is, and will continue to grow as cheap cars from Tata and Chery dramatically cut barriers to car ownership in the developing world. Millions of new households will suddenly have straws to start sucking at the world’s rapidly shrinking oil reserves.
Car purchases in Russia, for example, are exploding as US sales stagnate (Chart 2), while in India the advent of the Tata Nano, a car that will sell for as little as US$2,500 will allow millions of households in the developing world to own automobiles when they otherwise could not. It is the savings necessary to buy a car, not the price of gasoline that poses the greatest obstacle to fuel demand growth in those countries. But between rapidly rising domestic incomes and rapidly falling car prices, that obstacle is becoming more and more surmountable.
The Millionaire Next Door by Thomas J. Stanley, William D. Danko Amazon Price: $10.20
Customer Review: The authors of this book give a more realistic approach on how to join the ranks of America's wealthy. Always live well below your means is one of the rules. There are others. The authors discover that most of the wealthy households were not located ...
The Millionaire Mind by Thomas J. Stanley Amazon Price: $11.55
Customer Review: I bought the book few months ago but I did not finish it, so I bought the audio book that I play when I am driving around in town audio books are good for people like me who are busy.
Millionaire Women Next Door: The Many Journeys of Successful American Busines... by Thomas J. Stanley Amazon Price: $19.11
Customer Review: This book is definitely worth a read for two reasons:
(1) the subject matter is an area where there just aren't a lot of books, and
(2) this book says some of the non-politically correct things that most books / shows / people in societ...
Marketing to the Affluent by Thomas J. Stanley Amazon Price: $21.95
Customer Review: If you're looking to become involved in personal selling to high net worth individuals this book will hit quite close to the mark. However, much of his data is quite dated from the early 80's. A lot of things have changed since then. For instance, he...
Networking with the Affluent by Thomas J. Stanley Amazon Price: $17.95
Customer Review: I never realized how easy it is to network with the high profile people. Like anythingelse, it can be learned.
Networking With The Affluent is a must read for all entrepeneurs, sales and business people. This is the book that your most successful c...
Stay on top of the latest headlines from the Wall Street Journal Online.
The Wall Street Journal Whats Newsby The Wall Street Journal
Stocks closed a dismal week narrowly mixed. Crude oil fell for the sixth straight session touching a five-month low. The economy lost 84 thousand jobs in August while the unemployment rate jumped to 6.1%. The bleak jo...
There is little evidence to suggest that Chinese manufacturing competitiveness has deteriorated meaningfully.
Updated Twice Daily - Click to Listen