Archive for the ‘Financials’ Category
Few Gain, Many Lose from Frannie Bailout
Monday, September 8th, 2008
UK bank shares are having a huge day (above are the 9:20 a.m. (Eastern Time) prices of UK bank stocks, September 8, 2008), following this weekends Frannie bailout announcement.
It appears that the short squeeze in bank stocks is in this morning’s trading.
Here are some excerpts from the saavy folks at DealBook.
Over the years, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac showered riches on many winners: their executives, Wall Street bankers and Washington lobbyists. Now the foundering mortgage giants are leaving some losers in their wake, notably their shareholders, rank-and-file employees and, in the worst case, American taxpayers.
Golden Parachutes all around:
Daniel H. Mudd, the departing head of Fannie Mae, stands to collect $9.3 million in severance pay…
Richard F. Syron, the departing chief executive of Freddie Mac, could receive an exit package of at least $14.1 million
Its not clear that these former Frannie executives will actually get compensated.
But worst of all, long investors in either are getting killed:
The shareholders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, including many employees, will not be so lucky. The companies’ share prices have plunged about 90 percent this year, wiping out about $70 billion of shareholder value. The shares are likely to be worth little or nothing under the government’s rescue plan.
As a result, Wall Street money managers and everyday investors alike stand to lose big. Bill Miller, the star mutual fund manager at Legg Mason, increased his bet on Freddie Mac even as the company’s shares plummeted this year. Last week, when Freddie Mac stock was trading at about $5, Legg Mason disclosed that it had bought an additional 30 million shares. Other value-oriented investors, including Rich Pzena, David Dreman and Martin Whitman, also placed big bets that the mortgage companies would recover. None of these money managers returned calls for comment.
“I am just shocked how they missed this, and why, when it became completely clear that the problem was snowballing, guys like Bill Miller doubled down,” Douglas A. Kass, head of Seabreeze Partners and an outspoken short-seller, told The Times.
And the few investors that gain:
Among the most vocal short-sellers betting against the companies is William A. Ackman, who runs a hedge fund called Pershing Square Capital. Mr. Ackman was among the earliest to warn of the credit crisis, and he is believed to have landed a windfall after shorting both companies, according to The Times, which cited a person with direct knowledge of a recent investment letter.
In the end, American taxpayers have been handed the bill, helping the rest of us around the world sleep a little better at night, now that a great deal of credit risk has been been mitigated.
Thank you Secretary Paulson.
Tags: Banks, Fannie Mae, Financials, Freddie Mac, GSE, Paulson
Posted in Banks, Credit Markets, Economy, Financials, Investment Strategy, Markets | No Comments »
Let Fannie, Freddie Fail: Jim Rogers
Monday, September 1st, 2008
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should not be saved if they go bankrupt, and economic stimulus packages do more harm to economies in the long run than good in the short term, Jim Rogers, CEO of Rogers Holdings, told CNBC Friday, August 29, 2008 at 3:15AM from Singapore.
View Part 1, Click Play
View Part 2, Click Play
Tags: Credit Markets, Derivatives, Fannie Mae, Financials, Freddie Mac, Jim Rogers, Mortgage
Posted in Banks, Credit Markets, Economy, Financials, Geo-political, Gold, Markets, Monetary Policy, Strategy, US Stocks, wisdom | No Comments »
PIMCO Co-CEO: When Markets Collide
Sunday, August 31st, 2008
About a month ago, Charlie Rose interviewed PIMCO’s Mohamed El Erian. El Erian is one of the country’s most successful money managers. He’s the co-CEO of the Pacific Investment Management Company, better known as PIMCO which oversees more than 829 billion dollars. He previously led Harvard University’s endowment to substantial returns on investment. In the interview, which is available below, Charlie Rose speaks to him about his new book “When Markets Collide” and how he sees the global economy today.
View Part 1, Click Play
View Part 2, Click Play
View Part 3, Click Play
Tags: credit market, Derivatives, El-Erian, PIMCO
Posted in Banks, China, Credit Markets, Economy, Emerging Markets, Financials, Fixed Income, Gold, India, Investment Strategy, Markets, Monetary Policy | No Comments »
Hendry: Speculation is Dead, Gold is Heading to $600
Saturday, August 30th, 2008
As you know, GreenLightAdvisor.com is a huge fan of the outspoken Hugh Hendry, CIO, Eclectica Asset, who has been a unique, eloquent, and brash voice in this market. Its our sense that Hendry is also uniquely alone, and lucid, in the marketplace in terms of his outlook, and for this reason should be added to your must see/must listen to list.
click image to watch
The segment which aired August 19, 2008 on CNBC Europe, also contains midway, a terrific interview with GE CEO Jeff Immelt.
“There is no role for speculation or speculators today. This is kaput,” Hendry said. “If we were Second World War generals, we’ve exposed our flanks. We’ve been wiped out. This is about fundamentals … this is about losing money.”
As the crisis unfolds, the policymakers’ focus should shift from the threat of inflation to that of the world economic downturn, which could be more severe than economists anticipate, he said. (Watch Hendry’s interview below for more on the economy, inflation and commodities).
China, which many believe will balance out slowdowns elsewhere, will struggle if difficulties in the U.S. continue, while the current spike in producer prices is just a hangover from rising oil prices earlier this year, Hendry said.
“I fear that the central bankers of the world are fighting yesterday’s battle,” he said.
As for the banking sector, it is “insolvent,” Hendry said, adding he can’t tell just how low those stocks will go.
Tags: Banks, Commodities, Economy, Hugh Hendry, Monetary Policy, Recession
Posted in BRIC, Banks, Brazil, China, Commodities, Credit Markets, Crude Oil, Economy, Emerging Markets, Financials, Fixed Income, Gold, India, International Markets, Markets, inflation | No Comments »
Meet The Press: Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson
Sunday, August 10th, 2008
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson gets grilled by Tom Brokaw — live from Beijing.
Running time, 07:36 minutes
Thanks to VJ for alerting TBP about this video, who posted the following comment:
“Brokaw repeatedly splashes Paulson in the face with reality on this morning’s Meet the Press: * Tells him the stimulus checks that his Treasury sent out “had about as much effect as a BB gun on a bear”. * Displayed his ‘CONTAINED’ quote up on the screen, “I don’t see [subprime mortgage market troubles] imposing a serious problem. I think it’s going to be largely contained.” * Showed the video of Chimpy saying that “Wall Street got drunk”. Paulson said that in 5 months, he exits, stage Right.”
Who knew Brokaw had the stones to grill a senior politico?
Tags: Credit, Markets, Video
Posted in Credit Markets, Economy, Financials, Markets | No Comments »
Faber: Global Economy in Recession
Saturday, August 9th, 2008
Investor Marc Faber, publisher of the Gloom, Boom & Doom Report, talks with Bloomberg’s Kathleen Hays about the euro’s performance against the U.S. dollar, the commodities market and the global economy. The euro fell the most in almost eight years against the dollar as traders pared bets the European Central Bank will raise interest rates as the economy slows.
click for video
00:00 Euro versus dollar; “global recession”
01:54 U.S. economy, ECB rates; commodities market
04:14 Investment strategy: dollar, Japan
Running time 05:18
Source:
Faber Says Global Economy in Recession; `Long’ on Dollar: Video
Bloomberg, August 8, 2008 15:27 EDT
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aUSFhyJW5QGU
Courtesy: Barry Ritholtz, The Big Picture
Tags: Commodities, Dollar, Economy, Euro, Faber, GloomBoomDoom, Recession
Posted in Economy, Emerging Markets, Euro, Financials, International Markets, Monetary Policy | No Comments »
Oil and U.S. Banks
Friday, July 25th, 2008
(by John Authers, FT.com) Bastille Day, July 14, is a good day for an old order to come to a sudden and brutal end. And on July 14, the blade came down on the phenomenally successful “buy oil, sell financials” trade.
This trade, popular with hedge funds, offered a rare way to make money this year. It exploited the credit crisis and the response it provoked from the Federal Reserve. Investors deserted banks in the US (and Europe to a lesser extent) and bet that liquidity would instead flow to oil. As higher oil prices made i
t harder to aid banks with lower rates, and intensified pressure on banks’ customers, it was self-reinforcing.
By July 14, a trade of buying crude oil futures on Nymex while selling short the KBW index of US commercial banks would have made a profit of 168 per cent for the year. Even if we substitute the broader MSCI world financials index for the KBW, which covers the banks most exposed to US housing, the trade had made 114 per cent.
Then, banks bounced while oil dropped 15 per cent. The trade, using the KBW index, lost 35 per cent in the six days after Bastille Day (20.7 per cent using the MSCI world financials index).
This plunge was also self-reinforcing, in a different way. Traders covering their short positions by buying back bank stocks may have funded this by selling their positions in oil.
Note, however, that anybody who made the “long oil/short US banks” trade at the beginning of the year is still sitting on a gain of 74 per cent, much the same as they were six weeks ago. This has not hurt that much.
With the trade back to its level of early June, it appears, thankfully, that we can chalk up the extremes for banks and oil in the weeks before Bastille Day to speculative “piling on”.
But traders now have to find a new way to make money. And the world must still contend with the strong fundamental reasons for high oil prices and cheap US bank stocks.
Tags: Commodities, Credit Markets, FT.com, John Authers, kbw, long oil, Nymex, oil, short banks, Trading, US Banks
Posted in Commodities, Financials, Markets, Oil & Gas, US Stocks, inflation | No Comments »
Video: Nouriel Roubini (3 Parts)
Friday, July 25th, 2008
Nouriel Roubini, NYU Stern School of Business, opines about the market, the credit crisis, and the housing market in this 3 part interview:
Bear Market Only Half Over, But It’s Not Armageddon
More Than $1 Trillion Needed to Solve Housing Crisis
‘They’re All Toast’: Roubini Says Brokers, Even Goldman, Can’t Stay Independent
Sources:
Video Interview on Tech Ticker: Roubini: “Bear Market Only Half Over, But It’s Not Armageddon”
Tags: Banks, Brokers, Economics, Financials, Housing Market, Nouriel Roubini, RGE Monitor
Posted in Credit Markets, Financials, Gold, Markets, Monetary Policy | No Comments »
Video: Faber Says Fannie, Freddie Should Split Up, Not Get Aid
Friday, July 25th, 2008
Investor Marc Faber, publisher of the Gloom, Boom & Doom Report, talks about the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the global economy, and the outlook for stocks and commodities. Faber said Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae should close down their business or split into private companies and not get government aid.
click for video
00:00 “The world is in recession already.”
01:35 Earnings to “decelerate”; technology stocks
02:59 Need to close down or split Fannie, Freddie
05:11 Concerns about technology stocks
05:41 S&P 500 forecast; outlook for interest rates
07:50 “The Fed is totally ineffective.”
08:39 Outlook for oil prices, commodity markets
10:35 Credit crunch, impact on economy
11:24 Overseas interest in U.S. assets; China
13:46 U.S. resource companies “attractive” to Asia
14:47 Worst case: “colossal bust with inflation”
Source:
Faber Says Fannie, Freddie Should Split Up, Not Get Aid
Bloomberg, July 23, 2008 07:22 EDT
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=af89KR4uyEGI
Tags: Bail Out, Credit Crisis, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Marc Faber
Posted in Banks, Commodities, Credit Markets, Financials, Geo-political, Gold, Markets | No Comments »
The Truth About Bear Stearns
Thursday, July 17th, 2008
Bryan Burrough, Vanity Fair, writes a stunning piece Bringing Down Bear Stearns, which details the events leading to the collapse of America’s 5th largest investment bank, and its Fed-orchestrated take-out by J. P. Morgan. The article provides a gripping, insider look at the storied investment bank’s shocking collapse, ultimately raising serious questions about who’s to blame. It is also now the fodder for the financial sector naked-shorting curbs that are slated to start next week. Put it in your must read pile.
It was an uneventful morning—at first. Molinaro sat in his sixth-floor corner office, overlooking Madison Avenue, catching up on paperwork after a week-long trip visiting European investors. Then, around 11, something happened. Exactly what, no one knows to this day. But Bear’s stock began to fall. It was then, questioning his trading desks downstairs, that Molinaro first heard the rumor: Bear was having liquidity troubles, Wall Street’s way of saying the firm was running out of money. Molinaro made a face. This was crazy. There was no liquidity problem. Bear had about $18 billion in cash reserves.
Yet the whiff of gossip Molinaro heard that morning was the first tiny ripple in what within hours would grow into a tidal wave of rumor and speculation that would crash down upon Bear Stearns and, in the span of one fateful week, destroy a firm that had thrived on Wall Street since its founding, in 1923.
The fall of Bear Stearns wasn’t just another financial collapse. There has never been anything on Wall Street to compare to it: a “run” on a major investment bank, caused in large part not by a criminal indictment or some mammoth quarterly loss but by rumor and innuendo that, as best one can tell, had little basis in fact. Bear had endured more than its share of self-inflicted wounds in the previous year, but there was no reason it had to die that week in March.
To watch an interview with Bryan Burrough, author of Barbarians at the Gate, and Bringing Down Bear Stearns, Click Here
Tags: Bear Stearns, Bryan Burrough, Molinaro, Rumors, Vanity Fair
Posted in Credit Markets, Financials, Markets | No Comments »
Horizons BetaPro Bull Plus and Bear Plus ETFs
Friday, July 11th, 2008
Canadian investors looking for the equivalent of the popular Proshares which are available on American exchanges can do so via Horizons BetaPro ETFs which trade on the TSX. These ETFs allow investors with long-only accounts to easily bet against the market or hedge their bets. The Horizons BetaPro ETFs provide either double or double the inverse of the daily returns of the asset classes they track. In the current market environment, the HBP Financials Bear Plus ETF (up 31.4%) and HBP Nymex Crude Oil Bull Plus (up 113.8%) have been huge winners.
Below is a listing of Horizons BetaPro ETFs and their YTD returns. YTD returns are not available for the funds launched this year.
Tags: Agricultural Grains, Bear Plus, Bull Plus, ETF, Financials, Horizons BetaPro, Howard Atkinson, JovFunds, Mining, Natural Gas, Nymex, Proshares, S&P 500, TSX 60, ultrashort, US Dollar
Posted in Agriculture, Canadian Stocks, Commodities, Crude Oil, ETF, Emerging Markets, Financials, Fixed Income, Gold, Markets, Oil & Gas, US Stocks, mining stocks | No Comments »
Hendry: Financials “Infected” by Bubble
Wednesday, July 2nd, 2008
Hugh Hendry, CEO, CIO, Eclectica Asset, guest hosted European Squawk Box this morning. A very informative interview with a bold discussion on what’s ailing the financial sector, and where Hendry, one of the UK’s top performing and most outspoken asset managers, is investing today.
Segment 1: http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=782713231
Segment 2: http://www.cnbc.com//id/25490573, includes CNBC Europe.
Hendry also sees few signs that the outlook is picking up for the US economy.
“I think we have to recognize the recessionary forces that are bringing to bear,” Hendry told CNBC. “Don’t fight that, just go with the flow of the relative momentum.”
Hendry said the outlook is particularly bleak for financial and technology stocks — the two largest components of the S&P 500 — which he said have both seen a bubble.
“When a sector becomes infected by a bubble…what history reveals is it takes 25 years to regain the highs that we saw in real terms,” he said.
(click on image to see video)
Hendry took the view that in a sustained market downturn, successful investing requires looking for more unconventional assets such as agriculture that have the potential to outperform the market.
“I think the most important thing to know is you don’t have to short this market,” Hendry said.
“If you want to stay involved the most important thing is make sure the stock you own is trending higher vis-à-vis the marketplace.”
This is one of the best interviews we’ve seen in a long time.
Tags: Agriculture, Commodities, Gold
Posted in Agriculture, Commodities, Credit Markets, Financials, Markets, Strategy | No Comments »
Where is the Boom, and the Doom?
Tuesday, July 1st, 2008
July 1, 2008 - The first half of this year has been chaotic and confusing for investors given the Subprime fiasco and rapid deterioration of fundamentals in the Banking and Finance sectors, the secular selloff in stocks globally, recession in the US, and soaring oil and commodity prices.
US Global Investors, an American mutual fund company, founded by Toronto native, Frank Holmes, interviews Dr. Marc Faber, author of the Gloom, Boom, and Doom Report, for 1:15 hrs in this highly informative webcast (courtesy of Investment Postcards) aptly titled, “Where is the Boom, Gloom and Doom?”
Please click here to listen to the webcast.
Source: US Global Investors, June 27, 2008.
Tags: BRIC, China, Commodities, Emerging Markets, Frank Holmes, GDP Growth, globalization, GloomBoomDoom, GreenLightAdvisor.com, India, Infrastructure, Marc Faber, oil, urbanization
Posted in Agriculture, BRIC, Brazil, China, Commodities, Credit Markets, Eastern Europe, Emerging Markets, Financials, India, Markets, energy | No Comments »
The Bonfire of the Vanities, the Sequel
Thursday, June 26th, 2008
June 26, 2008 - Andrew Ross Sorkin, of the New York Times, writes about how prophetic Tom Wolfe’s declaration was on the day of the Blackstone debut: “We may be witnessing the end of capitalism as we know it.”
When you get to the end of an era, marking the timeline with watershed events is always therapeutic. Here are some excerpts from Sorkin’s NYTimes article:
… Mr. Wolfe must be in attendance — was that the Blackstone Group, the big private equity firm, was minutes away from going public, the largest initial public offering in the United States since 2002. (At the time, he told The New York Observer that a friend was giving him a tour.)
Just then, a CNBC reporter pulled Mr. Wolfe aside to ask him what he made of all the hubbub. Mr. Wolfe paused for a moment to contemplate his answer.
And then, with a wry smile, he delivered a prophetic declaration: “We may be witnessing the end of capitalism as we know it.”
One year later …
Blackstone’s stock has gone nowhere but down since it went public, dropping nearly 50 percent from its high the day it started trading. But that’s the least of it.
The once mighty Wall Street investment banks have been brought to their knees, sending out pink slips to more than 83,000 employees worldwide, racking up billions of dollars in losses as a results of their foolish forays into subprime mortgages. Bear Stearns all but went out of business before being “saved.” Some hedge funds have gone belly up.
Those lords of private equity, many of which were preparing to follow Blackstone into the public markets, have been put on semipermanent hiatus. (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Company refuses to withdraw its I.P.O filing, almost a year after submitting it, with no immediate hope in sight.) Their deal-making has all but stopped.
As Mr. Wolfe nicely put it, “It sounds like even the firms that aren’t in trouble are in trouble.”
And, what of credit …
And yet, there has been a perverse, and misguided, optimism that somehow the situation will improve in the second half of 2008. How? Sure, the big banks may take fewer write-downs — but there is no way of knowing that. The news a few days ago that the big bond insurers were being downgraded will create new havoc — and losses — for holders of toxic subprime debt. Indeed, the bigger issue is what kind of business is going to generate any return for its investors. When you can’t lend or trade — and you can’t invest with the leverage that juiced returns to support seven- and eight-figure bonuses — how exactly are you going to make money?
“It has always interested me that the word ‘credit’ comes from the word ‘credere,’ which means ‘to believe,’ ” Mr. Wolfe said. “It only works if people believe in it.” He’s right, of course: one reason the credit markets have tanked is that people don’t believe anymore.
Complete Article:
A “Bonfire” Returns as Heartburn, Andrew Ross Sorkin, NYTimes, June 24, 2008
Tags: Andrew Ross Sorkin, Banks, Bear Stearns, Blackstone, capitalism, Dealbook, Financials, Markets, Tom Wolfe
Posted in Banks, Credit Markets, Economy, Financials, Markets, Satire, US Stocks | No Comments »
Oil: Higher Prices Lead to Lower Prices?
Saturday, June 14th, 2008
Will higher prices for crude oil lead to lower prices? The debate rages on in these days of oil north of $135.
Rob Fraim ’s recent report (Mid-Atlantic Securities, Inc.) is worth serious consideration as he has a good track record in this sphere, and secondly, his is a common-sense approach. It comes our way courtesy of Investment Postcards Blog, one of the finest on international investing.The paragraphs below are extracts from his excellent report.
I have for quite a lengthy period of time – going back several years – been bullish on energy markets and energy-related stocks. And fortunately this has been a decent call.
So now what? Last week a $10+ jump in the price of crude in one day. Visions of $200 oil dancing in their heads. Articles in the media about $15 gasoline, outcries about speculators driving up the price of oil, and the inevitable somewhat late-to-the-party recommendations to pile into the energy sector now.
Spoiler Alert: I’m going to suggest lightening up positions a bit in the energy sector. Sorry for ruining the suspense, but you’re busy, I’m wordy, and you were probably going to skip to the end anyway.
I’m not suggesting a complete exit – since I still believe that we will have reasonably high energy prices for the foreseeable future and that energy companies will be strong and profitable. However, I also believe that the oil market in particular has gotten a little goofy and frothy and that we are due for a meaningful pullback in crude – which is likely to impact the psychology and pricing for other energy markets as well. We all know how it is when the “hot money” gets out of a sector and how much volatility that can create.
Do I think that oil is going to $50? Not a chance? Not $50, not $60, not $80. But I do think that there is a better than average chance that we are going to revisit $100-ish and stabilize there for a while.
This being the case I am suggesting that reaping some profits and reducing energy positions a bit might be a wise move – at least on a trading basis. Keep a core holding for the long-term, but lighten up. Sell some stuff. Write some covered calls. Hedge a bit. Maintain the core but trade with part of your energy investments. Do something other than get whipsawed.
Why? A combination of fundamental, anecdotal, and emotional factors actually. (I might also throw in technical, psychological, sociological, zoological, anatomical, and astrological if I get really cranked up.)
Here are a few of the reasons why I am reaching this conclusion.
There are some indications that demand is actually beginning to fall – somewhat in the same way that it did in 1979 and 1980 when gas pump pain reduced gasoline use by 5% and 6% respectively.
Miles traveled in the US are down – off 4.3% in March. In the last week of May – with Memorial Day weekend – gas buying was down 3.9% from the previous year. Why the declines?
Consumers are adjusting their driving and consumption habits. There is a real switch toward smaller, more energy-efficient cars and away from trucks and SUVs. In May of this year 4-cylinder cars made up 45% of sales versus just 30% in 2005.
Anecdotally, transportation companies are adjusting as well. We had a conversation with a trucking company recently and they spoke of measures that they have put in place to reduce fuel consumption. They are using monitoring and tracking systems and technology to enforce the 55 mph limit on their drivers – instead of the “unofficial” 65 mph or so that was the norm before. They are very serious about this and have enacted real driver penalties for non-compliance. Different studies have shown different results, but roughly speaking the difference between 55 mph and 65 mph is about a 10% improvement in fuel economy.
A potentially strengthening US dollar can have a big effect. While we tend to focus on supply-and-demand metrics and speculative forces when talking about oil prices, the simple fact is that a lot of the rise in oil prices has been not about oil inflation, but rather dollar deflation. The greenback has been in a downward spiral for months – courtesy of the credit crisis, problems in the US economy, and the long series of interest rate cuts. Now that rates have likely bottomed and as the US economy comes out of panic/fear mode the odds favor somewhat of a rebound in the dollar.
Jeffrey Saut at Raymond James – a strategist for whom I have the utmost respect – has adopted a more bullish stance on the dollar after years of warning about dollar weakness. If he is right – as I suspect he is – dollar appreciation will bring down crude oil pricing – as the need is also lessened for oil producers to keep prices high on crude, which is their primary greenback denominated export.
Back to the supply and demand issues, we know that real (or perceived) energy consumption in the emerging economies in China and India has taken up all the supply “at the margin”. And it is those last few incremental percentage points of usage data that make the difference between tight markets (rising prices) and looser ones (stable to lower prices.) While the China and India growth stories are real – and will be a continuing factor – there are certain things that speak to a modest lessening of demand.
When government subsidies in many Asian nations disappear by year’s end, demand should slacken. And China, stockpiling supplies for the coming Olympics, will likely shift gears and cut back on its energy purchases by August according to some. Now, today’s report regarding potential demand from China speaks otherwise, but then again I could find another item that would again talk about demand leveling off. It’s always a tug of war of course, but I am getting the feeling that the picture is not nearly as one-sided as has been reported.
Furthermore a slackening economy here in the US should also take a little pressure off of the demand side of the equation.
While not the end-all of supply problems, there has been some modest production growth – largely from Russia. So all in all the supply and demand balance seems to be tipping back in a more favorable direction – at least for now – with some estimates and reports indicating that we have moved from a deficit of 900,000 barrels a day that had to be made up by dipping into reserves, to a global “cushion” of 600,000 barrels a day.
I also wonder at what point political ideologies and environmental concerns will crumble to voter dissatisfaction over painful energy prices – possibly opening up drilling in previously “off-limits” areas.
“There is no justification for the current rise in prices,” said Saudi Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi on June 9, 2008, calling for an energy summit between producing and consuming nations. Now to be sure, we can take anything from OPEC nations with a grain of salt, but ultimately it serves the interests of the oil producers for oil prices not to skyrocket too far – since this would encourage serious conservation measures and bring about further political pressure. While excess supply capacity is not huge, Saudi Arabia itself has about 2,000,000 barrels per day in potential production expansion capability.
So with all of that in mind, do I think that we’re going to return to the days of cheap energy and a huge energy price decline – as occurred after the 1980 spike? Hardly. It was easier to increase production back then since oil fields were less mature and exploited. Also there were a lot more energy inefficiencies (in cars, appliances, building materials and techniques) back then than there are now – areas that could be markedly improved easily enough.
No, not cheap energy – just maybe cheaper by a bit. It would not surprise me to see $100 to $105 oil by the end of the year. That probably equates to gasoline in the $3.50-ish area.
Of course the unknown and unknowable regarding crude oil is the geopolitical picture. What if Israel bombs Iran and the Straits of Hormuz are blocked? What about Nigeria? And Hugo Chavez down in Venezuela? And Iraq? Terrorists! Floods! Plagues! Locusts! Well, as we saw last Friday those types of concerns (absent the locusts) have been moving the energy markets. Did anything really happen on Friday – something other than rhetoric – that fundamentally impacted the picture? Not really. It was a speculation and fear-driven spike.
Now I’m not one of these folks who vilifies speculators and blames them for high prices. It’s a free market and speculators actually serve a purpose. But blame it or not, speculation does enter into the pricing picture as speculators vie with actual users of the commodity for a relatively limited pool of sellers. But like ’em or hate ’em, speculators give us our market timing opportunities – to buy when people are selling or sell when most are buying. It just seems to me that more than a little of today’s $136/barrel price tag on oil price has geopolitics/fear/speculation written on it.
Last week I wrote about the (in my view) somewhat silly finger-pointing and ranting about the role of speculators in having driven up the price or energy and noted that ultimately speculators aren’t bigger than the markets and that supply-and-demand always wins out. Speculative moves can last longer and go further than we expect – and no one, me especially, can hope to “top-tick” the market by selling at the very peak. That’s why my recommendation is not a 100% all-or-none exit from energy positions, but instead an attempt to be level-headed and proactive by taking advantage of speculative fever and “ringing the register” on portions of energy exposure.
Source: Rob Fraim,
Mid-Atlantic Securities, Inc, June 10, 2008.
Tags: China, Investment Postcards, jeffrey saut, Markets, Mid-Atlantic, naimi, oil, price, Rob Fraim, Saudi Oil Minister
Posted in Commodities, Economy, Financials, Markets, Oil & Gas, energy | No Comments »
When Markets Collide: Barron’s interviews el-Erian, Pimco’s co-CEO
Sunday, June 8th, 2008
June 2, 2008 - Pimco’s Co-CEO and co-CIO, Mohamed el-Erian discusses his new book, When Markets Collide, with Barron’s, which puts today’s market accidents in a unique perspective. Both the Barron’s interview and his book are must reads. Here is an excerpt:
What are the biggest things people missed?
Under a “just-in-time” risk-management mindset, people waited for the turn before taking risk off the table. Hubris took over. People believed these new derivative products would allow you to reposition your portfolio after the turn as opposed to preemptively. But that wasn’t a possibility with credit products and subprime, and losses were huge. People misinterpreted what these instruments can do, and didn’t retool significantly.
Who’s the poster boy for this way of thinking?
The book quotes Chuck Prince, [the former CEO] at Citibank, on the front page of the Financial Times, words to the effect that when the music stops it will be messy, but as long as it’s playing he’s on the dance floor dancing. Within weeks the music stopped and people couldn’t get off the dance floor. In many of these sophisticated firms, the traders did things that neither the middle nor the back office could support, and the result was very big losses. It’s like pipes in your house that are very old. Every once in a while, one will rupture below and you have a very messy cleanup.
When Markets Collide: Investment Strategies for the Age of Global Economic Change
Tags: Barron's, Chuck Prince, Citigroup, Economic Change, El-Erian, Markets, PIMCO, Risk, When Markets Collide
Posted in Credit Markets, Economy, Financials, Markets, Strategy, inflation | No Comments »
Don Coxe’s Recommendations, Basic Points (05/30/2008)
Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008
June 3, 2008 – Here we feature the recommendations of Don Coxe, BMO Capital’s Chief Investment Strategist.
As usual, his paragraphs are eloquent and provide significant guidance. Don Coxe’s Investment Recommendations, excerpted from Basic Points, Traders of the Lost Arc, May 30, 2008.
1. Assume that the leading US forecasters on the US economy will be cutting back on their economic and earnings forecasts. You could be pleasantly surprised, but you’ll more likely feel the other kind of pleasure—the sensation of being right.
2. Assume that the leading global forecasters will be cutting back on their economic and earnings forecasts. The actual outcomes will doubtless vary widely, but enough to challenge the performances of global stock indices.
3. Until the US financial stocks stop declining, rallies in the S&P or Nasdaq are selling opportunities. If the US banks still have problems when they can pledge their otherwise-unmarketable merchandise to borrow T-Bills, then those problems aren’t going away in a hurry. If the BKX index breaks 75, assume that the bad news is about to become much worse.
4. Gold and gold stocks become more attractive each week that global food and fuel costs rise along with writedowns on bank balance sheets.
5. Natural gas prices have benefited from the unusually cold winter in the Northern Hemisphere. They could be hurt if the cooling continues through July—when air conditioning demand peaks. Nevertheless, we believe the natural-gas-oriented stocks are fundamentally attractive.
6. The dollar failed to rise significantly even as US stocks were rallying and economic forecasters were declaring that the worst of the housing problems were over. If it goes to a new low, it will drive even more global investment funds into commodities and/or commodity stocks.
7. Wheat is the only grain to have experienced a dramatic rise and fall—a short squeeze rally, followed by a collapse—amid evidence of a huge winter wheat crop. Otherwise, the grains and oilseeds have been wellbehaved, within strong uptrends. Build exposure to the leading agricultural stocks.
8. The risks to global economic growth from stagflationary food and fuel conditions continue to increase. The commodity class whose outlook is most negatively affected by such perceptions is the base metal and steel group. We believe those stocks are the only truly vulnerable commodity sector for the balance of this year—barring a sudden, Black Swan-style, reversal in oil.
9. We didn’t expect to see spot oil at $133. Nor did we expect the oil futures curve to move—albeit briefly—into contango. As this is written, oil for delivery in 2016 trades slightly above spot crude. If this move toward contango accelerates, expect response from the Fed and the ECB. Within the oil group, emphasize producers with long-lived reserves, and underweight the Big Oil companies that are failing to replace their production.
10. The only thing more bearish for nominal bond portfolios than a central bank that doesn’t fight inflation is a central bank that suddenly discovers it must stop inflation in its tracks. That’s what happened when Paul Volcker took charge after the ghastly mistakes of his predecessors. We shall become interested in nominal long-term bonds again when Bernanke & Co. Drive short rates strongly higher. In the meantime, investors should emphasize real return bonds.
Tags: balance sheets, Banks, Basic Points, Bernanke, Black Swan, Commodities, contango, Crude Oil, Dollar, Don Coxe, ECB, Fed, financial stocks, Food prices, Gold Bullion, Grain, interest rates, Markets, oil, Traders of the Lost Arc
Posted in CPI, Canadian Stocks, Commodities, Credit Markets, Crude Oil, Economy, Emerging Markets, Financials, Gold, International Markets, Markets, Oil & Gas, Strategy, US Stocks, contango, inflation, wisdom | 1 Comment »
Whitney: Credit Crisis Will Run Into 2009
Wednesday, May 28th, 2008
Liz Moyer, Forbes
Bank analyst Meredith Whitney says the credit crisis will extend well into 2009, if not beyond. This means more pressure on financial stocks and bank balance sheets; banks have added $25 billion to loss reserves so far, but face mounting consumer credit losses in a second wave of the crisis that some bank executives have acknowledged will be worse than the first, which has cost hundreds of billions of dollars in write-downs and losses.
Wall Street’s originate-to-distribute model, designed to mitigate risk by spreading it around, actually exacerbated those risks. It encouraged banks to loosen lending standards because more loan volume meant higher profits; then it led to over-leverage, and finally to complacency. More and more paper dollars were created for trading on the assumption that housing prices would always go up. The first wave of the crisis affected trading books, but the second will hit lending. As long as housing values were rising, borrowers could refinance in perpetuity to avoid default. Losses mounted when the refinancing option disappeared. Banks relied too heavily on the securitization markets to boost lending to consumers, particularly in the form of mortgages.
In time, some lending will return, but the sky-high revenues of recent years will be hard to reclaim, says Whitney. The banking sector’s pullback in lending will cause further painful losses. Whitney believes banks will have to reserve an additional $170 billion through the end of next year just to keep up with estimated loan losses. “New and unforeseen strains on consumer liquidity will push more consumers into precarious credit positions and cause consumer credit losses to be far worse than what is currently estimated, even by the most draconian of investors,” Whitney says.
http://www.forbes.com/2008/05/20/whitney-banks-credit-biz-wall-cx_lm_0520banks_print.html
Hat Tip: BMS Inc.
Tags: Analyst, Banks, CIBC, Credit Crisis, credit market, Economy, Markets, Meredith Whitney, Oppenheimer
Posted in Credit Markets, Economy, Financials, Markets | No Comments »
Bill Gross: Hmmmm? (Investment Outlook June 2008)
Monday, May 26th, 2008
May 26, 2008 - Pimco’s Bill Gross makes a most humorous analyses, drawing parallels that the hordes are marching on the new Rome (America), and that its time to act. Make sure you read this must read, the June 2008 Investment Outlook, by Bill Gross. At the end, Gross puts forth his recommendations.
What this country needs is either a good 5 cent cigar or the reincarnation of an Illinois “rail-splitter” willing to tell the American people “what up” -”what really up.” We have for so long now been willing to be entertained rather than informed, that we more or less accept majority opinion, perpetually shaped by ratings obsessed media, at face value. After 12 months of an endless primary campaign barrage, for instance, most of us believe that a candidate’s preacher - Democrat or Republican - should be a significant factor in how we vote. We care more about who’s going to be eliminated from this week’s American Idol than the deteriorating quality of our healthcare system. Alternative energy discussion takes a bleacher’s seat to the latest foibles of Lindsay Lohan or Britney Spears and then we wonder why gas is four bucks a gallon. We care as much as we always have - we just care about the wrong things: entertainment, as opposed to informed choices; trivia vs. hardcore ideological debate.)
It’s Sunday afternoon at the Coliseum folks, and all good fun, but the hordes are crossing the Alps and headed for modern day Rome - better educated, harder working, and willing to sacrifice today for a better tomorrow. Can it be any wonder that an estimated 1% of America’s wealth migrates into foreign hands hands every year? We, as a people, are overweight, poorly educated, overindulged, and imbued with such a sense or self importance on a geopolitical scale, that our allies are dropping like flies. “Yes we can?” Well, if so, then the “we” is the critical element, not the leader that will be chosen in November. Let’s get off the couch and shape up-physically, intellectually, and institutionally-and begin to make some informed choices about our future. Lincoln didn’t say it, but might have agreed, that the worst part about being fooled is fooling yourself, and as a nation, we’ve been doing a pretty good job of that for a long time now.
Bill Gross - Investment Outlook - June 2008 - “Hmmmmm”
Tags: Bill Gross, BRICs, Emerging Markets, Fixed Income, Hordes, inflation, Investment Wisdom, Markets, philosophy, PIMCO, rome
Posted in BRIC, Brazil, CPI, China, Commodities, Economy, Emerging Markets, Financials, Geo-political, India, Infrastructure, Markets, Oil & Gas, Politics, Russia, US Stocks, inflation | No Comments »
Derek Webb Interview, Part 2 - Earning Superior Income (safely) in a Range Bound Market
Tuesday, May 13th, 2008
May 12, 2008 - GreenLightAdvisor.com recently interviewed [Part 2] Derek Webb, Portfolio Manager, Webb Asset Management. Here are some excerpts from Part II, in which Mr. Webb shares his strategy for earning superior investment income in volatile and range bound markets while minimizing downside risk. Here are some excerpts:On the investment income dilemma…
When you look at Canadians, they love their income; but where is the income coming from? Most funds are getting around this now by paying you back your own capital, so there it is. They offer 6-8%; the reality is nothing out there yields more than 5% and it costs 2% to run a fund plus an advisor gets 1%. The math just doesn’t add up. On top of that we have inflation. You don’t want that in a fund – where people are just paying you back your own money. To me it’s like investing in a utility where they have to sell a power plant each year to pay you your distribution. You would never invest in that company because long term the price of the stock is coming down.
How do we get around this? How do we do it? We spent a lot of time looking at this and the solution that we came up with is the following: Objective:
- Produce some decent high yields – we divided our strategy into 4 silos or buckets.
- Structure it so that it is tax efficient
Portfolio Strategy - For the full explanation, please read the complete interview:
Bucket #1 – Income Trusts
Income trusts have gotten a bad rap, but they are not bad especially if…
Bucket #2 – Earnings Driven Stock Buy Writes
We are buying the earnings driven stocks that we own in our hedge fund. How do we get income out of these stocks?
Bucket #3 – Value Stock Buy Writes
Bucket #3 is comprised of stocks that are not earnings related, but rather are washed out names, like banks. Let’s say banks trade sideways for the next 3 years…
Bucket #4 – Writing put options against short positions
Legally in Canada, we are allowed to be 20% short in a mutual fund and we are always 20% short because we have a very good short model. It’s very predictive, meaning simply,…
DW: It’s definitely lower than owning the stocks outright, and lower than a dividend fund.
Its lower risk than if you own a bank stock straight out vs. writing the call options on the same bank stock. Let’s say you own the bank at 100 and you write calls at 105…
GLA: Would you consider this suitable for a retired investor?
DW: Yes, certainly. Personally I think this is great for anybody, universally. It’s great for somebody who wants to grow capital, and it is great for somebody who wants a tax preferred income in retirement.
Download: Part II: Derek Webb Interview PDF File, May 2008, GreenLightAdvisor.com.
Visit Webb Asset Management for more information.
Tags: covered options, Derek Webb, Earnings Discipline, earnings driven, Investment Strategy, Markets, option premium, option yield, strike price, wamfunds.com, Webb Asset Management
Posted in Canadian Stocks, Commodities, Financials, Markets, US Stocks | No Comments »
Derek Webb Interview, Part 1 - Outlook and Investment Strategy
Tuesday, May 13th, 2008
May 12, 2008 - GreenLightAdvisor.com recently interviewed [Part 1] Derek Webb, Portfolio Manager, Webb Asset Management. Here are some excerpts from Part 1, in which Mr. Webb shares his outlook and his thoughts about how he trades in volatile and range bound markets. Here are some excerpts:
Regarding the Fed’s recent moves…
Anytime the Fed puts this much liquidity in to the system it’s like blowing into a pipe; all that pressure has to go somewhere—When the Fed drops hay bails of money out of the helicopter, those hay bails of money are like molecules. They have to attach themselves to something.
When you look at the huge amount of money put into the system because of the Long Term Capital Meltdown and Russia—now that liquidity event created the internet bubble. This is no different.
All of this liquidity is going to find a home. I’ll tell you that I think it’s finding its home right now. Fundamentally I am very bullish because of all this liquidity.
On his investment focus…
Through our quantitative homework we found that the delta or change in earnings is the only thing that’s predictable in terms of determining the direction of a stock’s price. That’s all we focus on; that’s all our research focuses on. So, where is that delta accelerating right now—it’s in commodities. Agriculture is number one, Oil and gas are number two, some base metals number three, like copper—The shine has kind of come out of precious metals in the short run, but I don’t think that trade’s over, I think it’s more of a seasonal thing right now.
On when to sell:
[Firstly], If we saw one analyst lower EPS forecasts for Potash, for example, WE WOULD BE OUT. Analysts are out there doing site visits. They’re doing their homework – as long as they’re raising their numbers we’re going to be long. As soon as we would see them hold steady or lower their numbers we would be out.
Secondly, if the earnings themselves just start to de-accelerate, meaning we are looking at a smooth line of earnings, not to get complicated, but we look from 3