Mark Mobius, executive chairman of Templeton Asset Management, is very positive on commodities, especially integrated emerging markets oil companies including Chinese and Indian energy firms like Reliance. He shares his views with CNBC’s Martin Soong and Sri Jegarajah.
click to view video
“China’s Still a Great Investment”
The long-term story in China is still very bright. And investors should take note that H-shares are currently trading at a substantial discount to their A-share counterparts says Mark Mobius, executive chairman at Templeton Asset Management. He also goes further afield to say that Russia is in a sweet spot, that Putin has done all the right things for Russia and comments positively that Russia’s diplomacy in the Georgia affair has far reaching foreign relations benefits.
About a month ago, Charlie Rose interviewed PIMCO’s Mohamed El Erian. El Erian is one of the country’s most successful money managers. He’s the co-CEO of the Pacific Investment Management Company, better known as PIMCO which oversees more than 829 billion dollars. He previously led Harvard University’s endowment to substantial returns on investment. In the interview, which is available below, Charlie Rose speaks to him about his new book “When Markets Collide” and how he sees the global economy today.
As you know, GreenLightAdvisor.com is a huge fan of the outspoken Hugh Hendry, CIO, Eclectica Asset, who has been a unique, eloquent, and brash voice in this market. Its our sense that Hendry is also uniquely alone, and lucid, in the marketplace in terms of his outlook, and for this reason should be added to your must see/must listen to list.
click image to watch
The segment which aired August 19, 2008 on CNBC Europe, also contains midway, a terrific interview with GE CEO Jeff Immelt.
“There is no role for speculation or speculators today. This is kaput,” Hendry said. “If we were Second World War generals, we’ve exposed our flanks. We’ve been wiped out. This is about fundamentals … this is about losing money.”
As the crisis unfolds, the policymakers’ focus should shift from the threat of inflation to that of the world economic downturn, which could be more severe than economists anticipate, he said. (Watch Hendry’s interview below for more on the economy, inflation and commodities).
China, which many believe will balance out slowdowns elsewhere, will struggle if difficulties in the U.S. continue, while the current spike in producer prices is just a hangover from rising oil prices earlier this year, Hendry said.
“I fear that the central bankers of the world are fighting yesterday’s battle,” he said.
As for the banking sector, it is “insolvent,” Hendry said, adding he can’t tell just how low those stocks will go.
Once again, we continue to be impressed by the charting and tabling work that Bespoke Investment Group compiles on a daily basis. Here below is the latest survey which compiles the largest market capitalizations of companies from around the world.
One notable standout is the size difference between Exxon Mobil ($438-billion) and Gazprom ($237-billion). We point this out simply because while Exxon is worth close to twice as much in market cap, Gazprom happens to be 6 times larger according to their total hydrocarbon reserves, and a reserve life index of roughly 28 years or so, vs. Exxon’s 17-18 years. This is the post Georgia debacle, post-oil-price-downturn price. Russian energy companies are cheap, cheap, cheap.
And, even after the huge haircut that PetroChina and China’s largest banks and companies have gotten the last year, PetroChina still commands 2nd place at $341-billion, China Mobile at 5th place, ICBC at 7th place, and CCB in the 15th spot.
Finally, where is India? We give 3-5 years before several Indian outfits make it to the market cap pantheon. That spells opportunity.
Below we highlight the 30 largest companies in the World by market cap ($). As shown, Exxon Mobil is the top dog by about $70 billion. Exxon is trailed by another energy company, Petrochina, then General Electric and Microsoft. Eleven of the top 30 are based in the United States. The Energy sector has the largest representation at 8, followed by Technology at 5. Only 3 companies in the top 30 are up in 2008 — Wal-Mart, IBM and Johnson&Johnson. And Apple and Google followers will be happy to see them ranked 25th and 26th in the World.
There is little evidence to suggest that Chinese manufacturing competitiveness has deteriorated meaningfully.
The mainstream media has been filled with reports about Chinese companies closing production facilities due to rising costs. Some analysts have concluded that China is quickly losing its competitive edge, and international producers are moving to other countries. In reality, there has been no meaningful decline of China’s export market share, particularly when exports of oil-producing countries are excluded. Indeed, China’s slowing export growth in recent months is a reflection of changing global market conditions rather than a deterioration in Chinese producers’ competitiveness. Rising input costs due to higher commodities prices are not unique to China: manufacturers around the world are suffering similar cost pressures and margin squeezes. In addition, the RMB’s appreciation has not been excessive, rising at a 3.5% annual rate in trade-weighted terms since its 2005 de-peg from the U.S. dollar. The trade-weighted yuan is still below its 2002 levels, when the economy was struggling with a deflationary shock. Finally, recent weakness in the export sector can be partially attributed to the Chinese government’s voluntary export restraints, which have been part of the country’s broader growth-rebalancing strategy. These policies could be removed any time if excessive weakness develops. Already, the government has increased VAT rebates for textile and garment exporters since the beginning of the month.
July 1, 2008 - The first half of this year has been chaotic and confusing for investors given the Subprime fiasco and rapid deterioration of fundamentals in the Banking and Finance sectors, the secular selloff in stocks globally, recession in the US, and soaring oil and commodity prices.
US Global Investors, an American mutual fund company, founded by Toronto native, Frank Holmes, interviews Dr. Marc Faber, author of the Gloom, Boom, and Doom Report, for 1:15 hrs in this highly informative webcast (courtesy of Investment Postcards) aptly titled, “Where is the Boom, Gloom and Doom?”
June 24, 2008 - Courtesy of Bespoke Investment Group - The recent selloff in equities has really spared no one. As shown in our trading range charts below of 22 major country indices, the trend has been down across the board in recent weeks. Even Brazil, Mexico and Russia, who had all held up relatively well this year, have sold off quite a bit. Currently, 19 of the 22 countries are trading in oversold territory (Canada, Japan and Russia are neutral). European countries like France, Germany and Italy have really taken it on the chin, while China and India remain the biggest losers in 2008. After forming short-term uptrends off of the March lows, global equity markets have now lost most of their gains and are looking to move back into downtrends.
Exclusive Interview Nick Barisheff, President and CEO, Bullion Management Group Inc.
This week we interview Mr. Nick Barisheff, President & CEO, Bullion Management Group, and discuss with him the importance of gold bullion. Mr. Barisheff founded Bullion Management Group Inc. in 1997, and is the portfolio manager of BMG BullionFund, Canada’s only open-ended fund investing purely in gold, silver, and platinum bullion.
GreenLightAdvisor.com: What’s the most important thing people need to understand about gold?
Nick Barisheff: Many people think gold is a commodity like copper, zinc or pork bellies, but it has 3,000 years of history as money. It was money that no government created by edict. It was just adopted for usage by itself, and it was and still is the best form of money. Currently, we have a 37-year global experiment in paper money. All prior paper money experiments ended in hyperinflation, with the currencies becoming worthless. All previous hyperinflations were contained within a single country, but this time, because of the reserve status of the US dollar, it is likely to be global in nature.
Right now, the price of gold is rising while most currencies are losing purchasing power as well as their value against gold. Gold comes back into its monetary role when there’s a loss of confidence in the financial system or in paper money, and that’s when people are attracted to it. Before 1971, the monetary system was governed by the Bretton Woods Agreement. Under that agreement, the US dollar was backed by gold, and other currencies were pegged to the dollar. Other countries could trade their US dollars for gold. Essentially, US gold indirectly backed all other currencies. Then things changed. As the US was getting into the Vietnam War and into President Johnson’s policy of guns and butter, US gold reserves started declining. Countries holding dollars were presenting their US dollars and asking for gold in return, and that led to US gold reserves dropping from a peak of 22,000 tonnes to 8,800 tonnes. On August 15, 1971, President Nixon “closedthe gold window” and stopped the exchange of US dollars for gold. Closing the gold window was a euphemism, but basically the US declared bankruptcy. When you can’t meet your obligations when they are due, that’s what it is. So from that point in time, we’ve had 37 years where the entire world has been on a global fiat currency monetary system.
Since 1971, when the dollar was freed from the constraints imposed on a currency backed by gold, the US has experienced increasing federal government and current account deficits. The US is now borrowing $800 billion annually to fund its consumption of foreign-made goods and commodities, and the federal government is running a deficit of almost $350 billion. At some point, foreigners will become unwilling to continue funding US expenditures, forcing the Federal Reserve to expand the money supply at a faster pace. This will result in rising inflation, rising interest rates and a continuous decline in the US dollar. GLA: We’ve had the fastest money supply growth in almost 40 years that’s resulting in increased inflation. Why would an investor want to go into T-bills, given that interest rates don’t even cover half of the stated inflation rate, which we know isn’t even the real inflation rate?
NB: For the first time in history, we have an unlimited ability, by all central banks, to print, however much money we want, so to speak. Apart from the US M3 money supply growing at about 20%, we also have India and China growing theirs at about the same rate. China is at 18%, India is at 20%, and Russia is at 45%. As China or India sell goods to the US, they take in US dollars and they print yuan or rupees against those US dollars. Japan’s a little different; there, individuals and corporations can take their US dollars and buy US assets themselves. In China you have to turn your US dollars in to the central bank.
In today’s inflationary environment, many who invest in fixed income investment do not appreciate that instead of being “safe” investments, they are in fact guaranteed losses of purchasing power when you take inflation and taxation into account. We have done some analysis into a systematic withdrawal from our Fund for those investors requiring income. Based on the fact that precious metals have a long track record of staying ahead of inflation, an investor would be far better off in precious metals in terms of maintaining principal after inflation and having more after-tax cash flow to spend.
GLA: What did you think of John Embry’s (Sprott Asset Management) recent article about the manipulation of the price of gold? His assertion was that the central banks are deliberately keeping gold below $1,000 per ounce.
NB: John and Eric Sprott have recently written an extensive report called Not Free, Not Fair. The report brings forth a great deal of evidence that the precious metals markets may be manipulated. While it may seem like there’s a conspiracy to suppress the gold price, I think it’s simpler than that. It’s a well know fact that it is the job of central banks to manage their country’s currency, that’s part of their mandate. Central banks understand that gold is a currency, but one that they can’t expand as easily as paper money. I don’t think there is any lack of understanding on the part of central bankers that gold is an alternative currency.
GLA: Isn’t gold considered to be just a commodity with no real monetary role anymore?
NB: I’d like to refer to an article by Tony Fell , and it’s particularly interesting, given that he was chairman of RBC Capital Markets at the time of writing. He talks about how gold has three attributes: it’s a commodity, a store of value and a currency. He says so many people now think of gold only as a commodity or jewellery, or as an archaic relic, that there’s a feeling of “who needs it anymore?” People don’t think of it as money.
However, the daily sales volume gives a conclusive indicator that gold is much more than an industrial commodity. The physical turnover of gold by members of the UK’s London Bullion Marketing Association is about *$25 billion per day. We’re talking about net turnover between the LBMA members. The volume is estimated at 7-10 times that amount.
It’s pretty clear that these are currency transactions. That’s why gold, silver and platinum trade on the currency desks of all the banks and brokerages, not the commodity desks.
What people need to know is that gold is a currency [like dollars or euros or yen]. Gold is not trading at these volumes as a commodity or as some archaic relic.
GLA: What are your thoughts on technical analysis, given that gold is a currency?
NB: Technical analysis works if you’re looking at widely distributed stocks like the S&P 500, for example, where there are many, many transactions that accurately reflect public sentiment. The price of gold, however, can be impacted by one country, or one very wealthy individual who wakes up one morning and decides to buy, and then you can throw the charts away. Or when a government decides to sell or a government intervenes. I’ve looked at technical analysis for gold in the past and tried to back-test with various techniques and found that they don’t work more often than they do. In the most recent case, there is no justification for the drop in gold price; it should have been rising because nothing has fundamentally changed. In fact, the fundamentals got worse and the gold price should have rallied. None of the problems went away; nothing was solved; the conditions are as bad as or worse than they were previously. So the drop in gold’s price has been a false decline.
GLA: So, it’s the value of paper currency that changes, not the value of gold [so to speak]?
NB: One of the attributes of gold as money is that you can’t simply create it at will, like paper money. It’s no one else’s promise of performance and it’s not someone else’s liability. It’s not going to zero, no matter what. And, whether we’re moving the measuring stick of inflation or deflation really doesn’t matter, because the way gold should be measured is in terms of purchasing power. It doesn’t matter if gold is priced at $1,000 in paper money per ounce or $2 in paper money per ounce, it will retain its purchasing power in either circumstance.
The first important step in the big picture of understanding gold is that it is a store of wealth with a 3,000 year history, and it’s money. Over the long term, it retains its purchasing power. That’s why they say that an ounce of gold will always buy a man’s suit.
Apart from that, the US dollar is down 85% in purchasing power since 1971. In 1971 you could buy a car with 100 ounces of gold; a car was about $3,500 and gold was $35 an ounce. With 1,000 ounces, or about $35,000, you could buy a house. Today, you could buy several cars or a luxury car with 100 ounces, and a mansion with 1,000 ounces. You could also buy more units of the Dow Jones Industrial Average with your ounce today than you could in 1971. So that ounce has preserved its purchasing power while currencies have lost over 80% of their value.
GLA: Apparently, in the last 40 or 50 years, there’s only been three years that there was net selling by gold investors, three years out of almost half a century. Is this true?
NB: People who hold bullion tend to hold it for a long time, as the core of their entire wealth. It’s not sold once you understand its basic characteristics, because you have to have a reason to sell it, you have to use it to buy something better. I tend to look at investment performance as to whether I end up with more gold ounces or less gold ounces rather than percentage returns; you get a different conclusion then. For example, if you had invested 44 ounces in the Dow in 2000, you would now get back only 14 ounces.
This current cycle is not a conventional bull market in precious metals; I think we’re in the midst of a change in the global monetary system. This is not going to be like a typical commodity cycle where we go up for four years and down for four years; I think we’re witnessing a transition into another monetary system, whatever form that may take. At the end of this period the US dollar will no longer be the world’s reserve currency.
GLA: What happens if the US dollar ceases to be the standard?
NB: What happened when the British pound ceased to be the standard? It just ceased to be the standard. Its decline in value is still ongoing. It’s happened to every empire throughout history: the British, the Roman, the Greek, the Spanish, the Persian, and the Chinese. Every single empire ended up debasing their currency in order to maintain the empire.
GLA: Is gold likely to increase further going forward or has it topped and investors have missed out?
Currently, we have a lot of noise in terms of the credit contraction, real estate bubble, record high debt at all levels, dangerous derivatives vulnerabilities and unsustainable US current account and trade deficits. These could still blow up into bigger problems at any time. However let’s hope they get resolved or at the very least postponed somehow.
But there are two factors that are not changeable in all of this.
First: The US has to print money on an accelerating basis. Has to – because of the underfunded Social Security and Medicare obligations – which at present are about $60 trillion. If you took all of the net earnings of US individuals and companies it would not be enough to pay that off. You can’t tax people enough and politically you cannot tell everybody, “Sorry, we can’t give you your Social Security – we don’t have the money. And no Medicare either.” So they have to keep printing money.
Second: The issue of Peak Oil – it used to be a debate as to when the production of oil would peak. Now it looks like that has already happened, in March 2006. As a result we have a situation where oil production is declining while demand is increasing, particularly from India and China. This will result in ever-increasing oil prices, and also increasing prices for almost every product and service.
As these two forces – increased money printing and peak oil – interact, the result is a declining dollar alongside constantly increasing oil prices. This leads to even greater oil price increases in an effort to offset the dollar decline. These two highly inflationary factors are working in tandem, and they can’t be changed.
Therefore, as oil rises and the dollar declines, commodities – and particularly precious metals – will continue to rise.
GLA: What’s the relationship between oil and gold? NB: There’s not necessarily a great deal of correlation between the two in the short term. However, in the longer term, the correlation has been in the order of about 16 barrels of oil for every ounce of gold.
GLA: Has that been consistent long term and what is the outlook for precious metals?
NB: With only short-term fluctuations, this ratio has held up over the long term. At this point the price of gold is undervalued compared to the price of oil. Gold should be closer to $1,500 an ounce if you use this measure.
On top of this kind of inflationary issue eroding financial confidence, we’re at peak production in gold. When the price of gold was low, miners employed high-grading to get the most easily attainable gold out of the ground. As the price rises, miners resort to lower-grade mining, which has become worthwhile – but in some cases you have to sift through tonnes of ore for each ounce.
Platinum, for instance; it takes six months to get an ounce of platinum out of roughly 10,000 tonnes of ore. Right now, almost all the platinum produced originates in South Africa, and the mines are miles underground, and electricity intensive. Power shortages in South Africa are interfering with production and slowing things down. All these forces are coming together, slowing production and driving up prices.
With silver, most of the aboveground reserves have been depleted – most of the silver that is produced is consumed each and every year. Silver also has two demand drivers – monetary and industrial. The number of industrial applications are growing every year while the monetary demand has also been growing in the past few years. It is important to remember that “silver” means “money” in several languages.
GLA: Why is gold so important as an element of diversification for investors?
NB: Take a look at the cycle from 1968 to 1982 – during that time it took stocks the whole 14 years to break even. If you factor inflation into it, it actually took until 1995. So stocks didn’t look so good in the past cycle, and they are not looking very good now. The DJIA is well below its inflation-adjusted highs. Its performance is much worse when measured in gold ounces. The DJIA has declined from a high of 44 ounces of gold in 2000 to about 14 today, but if you look at a chart the Dow appears to be at new highs. It’s like taking the Zimbabwe stock market and saying, “Look how well Zimbabwean stocks have done; the market was up 8,000%.” But what if we adjust for the 100,000% inflation in that country? Not so good, is it?
BMG BullionFund is internally diversified. We buy physical gold, platinum, and silver in equal amounts. While some people like to focus on gold, they would miss out on the fact that silver and platinum have both outperformed gold since the beginning of this cycle in 2002. GLA: What do you do about inflation?
NB: First, it is important to look at real inflation. What is real inflation? The real number is around 9%, not 3%. The calculations the government uses for the Consumer Price Index (CPI) are really meaningless as a true inflation indicator. The real definition of inflation is an increase in the money supply that leads to an increase in prices. Prices do not increase on their own unless you have a shortage; when you increase the money supply, what you’re really doing is debasing the currency, and as the purchasing power of the currency declines prices appear to be rising. So with the US money supply (M3) growing at 20%, Canada’s growing at 9%, and most other countries’ growing at around 15%, that’s going to result in rising prices and real inflation. If you take real inflation into account, Wainwright Economics suggests that the appropriate bullion allocation for a bond investor’s portfolio is 18%, and for the equity investor’s portfolio 40%, and that’s just to break even with inflation. Although this may sound incredible, think of the 1970s. How much bullion was required just to break even in an equity portfolio? Bullion went up 2,300%, while equities were flat on a nominal basis. Inflation was 15%.
So without even getting wrapped up in a discussion about the complex subject of money, those two points are fairly straightforward. Ibbotson Associates confirmed that precious metals are the most negatively correlated asset class to the traditional financial assets, so it gives the biggest bang for the buck for the least amount of allocation. In the process you also achieve a more balanced, diversified portfolio. Advisors would do well to have an allocation to precious metals to protect their clients from under-diversification.
GLA: Do you think this pullback in gold is an opportunity to add to positions at this time?
NB: Yes as long as there hasn’t been a major change in the fundamentals that drive the price. When these pullbacks occur, you always get some technical interpretations, whether it’s conventional technical analysis or Elliot Wave, coming out with the idea that the bull market in precious metals is over and that it’s now going down forever and so on.
When these things happen, you have to ask if anything changed fundamentally to justify that decline. If nothing changed fundamentally, the only conclusion you can draw is that something’s wrong in the technical interpretations. In all likelihood the technical interpretation is wrong because there’s been an intervention by monetary authorities. Technical analysis only works when the markets are working freely.
GLA: Well, whatever it is they’re trying to do to knock the price down, once again, he who wins in the end is he who has the most ounces and the most shares. It’s got to have been a good year for you with gold prices up 10%, silver up close to 19% and platinum prices over 30%.
NB: Yes, it has. We have grown assets year-over-year by 80% this year alone, so it’s been a substantial increase, and performance-wise, we’re about 20% year-to-date.
GLA: Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge with us.
In his recent speech at Yale Class Day, Tony Blair had the following to share with students. The speech is well worth reading on many fronts, but if you’re an investor, then you’ll be interested in knowing what one of the great leaders of the free world has to say about what this century holds for both the West and the East.
For the first time in many centuries, power is moving East. China and India each have populations roughly double those of America and Europe combined.
In the next two decades, these two countries together will undergo industrialisation four times the size of the USA’s and at five times the speed.
We must be mindful that as these ancient civilisations become somehow younger and more vibrant, our young civilisation does not grow old. Most of all we should know that in this new world, we must clear a path to partnership, not stand off against each other, competing for power.
May 26, 2008 - Pimco’s Bill Gross makes a most humorous analyses, drawing parallels that the hordes are marching on the new Rome (America), and that its time to act. Make sure you read this must read, the June 2008 Investment Outlook, by Bill Gross. At the end, Gross puts forth his recommendations.
What this country needs is either a good 5 cent cigar or the reincarnation of an Illinois “rail-splitter” willing to tell the American people “what up” -”what really up.” We have for so long now been willing to be entertained rather than informed, that we more or less accept majority opinion, perpetually shaped by ratings obsessed media, at face value. After 12 months of an endless primary campaign barrage, for instance, most of us believe that a candidate’s preacher - Democrat or Republican - should be a significant factor in how we vote. We care more about who’s going to be eliminated from this week’s American Idol than the deteriorating quality of our healthcare system. Alternative energy discussion takes a bleacher’s seat to the latest foibles of Lindsay Lohan or Britney Spears and then we wonder why gas is four bucks a gallon. We care as much as we always have - we just care about the wrong things: entertainment, as opposed to informed choices; trivia vs. hardcore ideological debate.)
It’s Sunday afternoon at the Coliseum folks, and all good fun, but the hordes are crossing the Alps and headed for modern day Rome - better educated, harder working, and willing to sacrifice today for a better tomorrow. Can it be any wonder that an estimated 1% of America’s wealth migrates into foreign hands hands every year? We, as a people, are overweight, poorly educated, overindulged, and imbued with such a sense or self importance on a geopolitical scale, that our allies are dropping like flies. “Yes we can?” Well, if so, then the “we” is the critical element, not the leader that will be chosen in November. Let’s get off the couch and shape up-physically, intellectually, and institutionally-and begin to make some informed choices about our future. Lincoln didn’t say it, but might have agreed, that the worst part about being fooled is fooling yourself, and as a nation, we’ve been doing a pretty good job of that for a long time now.
May 12, 2008 - Jerome Booth, Head of Research at Ashmore Investment Management, UK, has written an insightful article for FT.com, Insight: A Global Rebalancing Act, May 12, 2008. Here are a few excerpts:
Gross national savings are over 30 per cent of GDP on average in emerging countries, and for a decade private and official savers in these countries have been investing overseas – in the US and Europe – under the impression that these were safer markets than at home. Yet the dollar is far from the safest currency and not the store of value it was. US Treasuries are not zero risk – the implicit myth in the term “the risk-free rate”. Treasuries have currency, curve and volatility risks. Investors in triple A structured credit got a shock when they realised their investment was risky.
Likewise emerging market savers are getting a shock about Treasuries and other US and European assets. The money is returning home, and the move is structural, not cyclical. The global imbalance of a negative US personal savings rate on the one hand being financed by high emerging savings on the other is starting to reverse.
With this reversal, or rebalancing, is coming, we believe, a currency realignment and a series of investment booms across emerging economies as investment focus shifts. Rather than using “decoupling” in describing the impact of the credit crunch on emerging markets, we should use “negative correlation”.
The policy asymmetry between the US and emerging markets is that the emerging markets, with undervalued currencies, have an additional degree of freedom. They have the choice to mess up (do nothing) or control inflation (let the currency rise, raise interest rates). In our view, emerging market central banks will largely pass this test and do the sensible thing, though this is not what the market appears to have priced in yet.
As recently as ten years ago, emerging markets still held their hands out for development loans and foreign aid. Today, their fiscal prudence and wealth has put them in the position of bailing out the western banking system.
Why are investors taking so long to realize this critical distinction and its meaning?
April 30, 2008 - CIBC World Markets Chief Strategist, Jeff Rubin, says that Oil will eventually reach $150/barrel in 2010 and over $200/barrel by 2012. He cites among the leading reasons, the advent of cheap cars from India and China, or rather Tatas and Cherys, that will enable millions of middle class Asians who couldn’t previously afford a car, to do so, Take these developments and place them agaisnt the backdrop of peak oil and a decline in oil exports from key suppliers, Saudi Arabia, Russia and Kuwait, and we are in the midst of a long term supply/demand imbalance. Here are couple of excerpts:
Whether we are already at the peak in world oil production remains to be seen, but it is increasingly clear that the outlook for oil supply signals a period of unprecedented scarcity.
Our latest review of probable supply suggests oil production will hardly grow at all, with average daily production between now and 2012 rising by barely more than a million barrels per day (see pages 4-7). Despite the recent record jump in oil prices, the outlook suggests that oil prices will continue to rise steadily over the next five years, almost doubling from current levels.
While global oil supply is not growing, global gasoline demand is, and will continue to grow as cheap cars from Tata and Chery dramatically cut barriers to car ownership in the developing world. Millions of new households will suddenly have straws to start sucking at the world’s rapidly shrinking oil reserves.
Car purchases in Russia, for example, are exploding as US sales stagnate (Chart 2), while in India the advent of the Tata Nano, a car that will sell for as little as US$2,500 will allow millions of households in the developing world to own automobiles when they otherwise could not. It is the savings necessary to buy a car, not the price of gasoline that poses the greatest obstacle to fuel demand growth in those countries. But between rapidly rising domestic incomes and rapidly falling car prices, that obstacle is becoming more and more surmountable.
April 27, 2008 - A recent Bloomberg article quotes Jim Rogers as to his bent for Chinese stocks and Commodities. Specifically, Rogers is focusing his attention in China in the areas of agriculture, airlines, tourism, and education.
“All my new money goes to commodities and China,’’ said Rogers.
“All the panic looks like a bottom,’’ he said. “I have bought in the last four to five weeks. I’ve been buying shares in China for the first time in a long time.’’
“China has a huge agricultural problem,’’ Rogers said. The “government is doing everything it can to revive the agriculture industry.’’
Rogers was bullish on the Chinese yuan, saying it could eventually rise to 2 yuan per dollar.
“Don’t sell your renminbi (yuan), because it will go a lot higher in the next 20 years,’’ Rogers said.
Apparently the folks at Morgan Stanley do not agree with Rogers, saying that China is a “sell.” Rogers appears to disagree vehemently.
Selling Chinese shares in 2008 “is a big mistake,’’ said Rogers, adding that he had also bought stocks in Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong. “I have never sold any Chinese shares.’’
The complete article is available by clicking below:
Investor Jim Rogers Buys Chinese Shares as Markets Hit Bottom, April 27, 2008, Bloomberg
April 16, 2008 - Every week or two, New Yorker Magazine interviews well known authors and other culturally connected people. This week’s insightful interview is with bestselling author of The Corrections, Jonathan Franzen, about his experiences and observations from his recent journey to China. Franzen had a toy bird and wanted to see where it came from, where it was made. In the interview he discusses the country’s rapid growth, the newness of China vs. America and the pros and cons, the enviromental impact of industrialization, and his personal views and experiences in China. Its a great listen.
Monday, April 14, 2008, 12:00:00 AM
Jonathan Franzen talks about his journey to China.
Franzen Bio: Jonathan Franzen was born in Western Springs, Illinois, in 1959, and grew up in Webster Groves, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. After graduating from Swarthmore College in 1981, he studied at the Freie Universit„t in Berlin as a Fulbright scholar and later worked in a seismology lab at Harvard University’s Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences. In addition to winning a Whiting Writers’ Award in 1988 and the American Academy’s Berlin Prize in 2000, he has been named one of “Twenty Writers for the 21st Century” by The New Yorker and one of the “Best Young American Novelists” by Granta.
Mr. Franzen is the author of The Twenty-Seventh City (FSG, 1988) and Strong Motion (FSG, 1992) and is a frequent contributor to Harper’s and The New Yorker (where portions of The Corrections have appeared). He lives in New York City.
The Millionaire Next Door by Thomas J. Stanley, William D. Danko Amazon Price: $10.20
Customer Review: The authors of this book give a more realistic approach on how to join the ranks of America's wealthy. Always live well below your means is one of the rules. There are others. The authors discover that most of the wealthy households were not located ...
The Millionaire Mind by Thomas J. Stanley Amazon Price: $11.55
Customer Review: I bought the book few months ago but I did not finish it, so I bought the audio book that I play when I am driving around in town audio books are good for people like me who are busy.
Millionaire Women Next Door: The Many Journeys of Successful American Busines... by Thomas J. Stanley Amazon Price: $19.11
Customer Review: This book is definitely worth a read for two reasons:
(1) the subject matter is an area where there just aren't a lot of books, and
(2) this book says some of the non-politically correct things that most books / shows / people in societ...
Marketing to the Affluent by Thomas J. Stanley Amazon Price: $21.95
Customer Review: If you're looking to become involved in personal selling to high net worth individuals this book will hit quite close to the mark. However, much of his data is quite dated from the early 80's. A lot of things have changed since then. For instance, he...
Networking with the Affluent by Thomas J. Stanley Amazon Price: $17.95
Customer Review: I never realized how easy it is to network with the high profile people. Like anythingelse, it can be learned.
Networking With The Affluent is a must read for all entrepeneurs, sales and business people. This is the book that your most successful c...
Stay on top of the latest headlines from the Wall Street Journal Online.
The Wall Street Journal Whats Newsby The Wall Street Journal
Stocks closed a dismal week narrowly mixed. Crude oil fell for the sixth straight session touching a five-month low. The economy lost 84 thousand jobs in August while the unemployment rate jumped to 6.1%. The bleak jo...
There is little evidence to suggest that Chinese manufacturing competitiveness has deteriorated meaningfully.
Exclusive Interview
080421_outloud_franzen.mp3
Updated Twice Daily - Click to Listen